2011
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of ASDEX Upgrade to disruption studies for ITER

Abstract: This paper describes the most recent contributions of ASDEX Upgrade to ITER in the field of disruption studies. (1) The ITER specifications for the halo current magnitude are based on data collected from several tokamaks and summarized in the plot of the toroidal peaking factor versus the maximum halo current fraction. Even if the maximum halo current in ASDEX Upgrade reaches 50% of the plasma current, the duration of this maximum lasts a fraction of a ms. (2) Long-lasting asymmetries of the halo current are r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ASDEX Upgrade device, an axisymmetric halo current can be required to prevent Alfvénic growth during the late period of a vertical displacement. 67 The toroidal peaking factor is highly dependent on the device in which it is measured, Figure 2. The physical layout of the conducting structures that surround the plasma appears to make a difference; this difference should be calculable.…”
Section: Current-source Drive For Halo Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the ASDEX Upgrade device, an axisymmetric halo current can be required to prevent Alfvénic growth during the late period of a vertical displacement. 67 The toroidal peaking factor is highly dependent on the device in which it is measured, Figure 2. The physical layout of the conducting structures that surround the plasma appears to make a difference; this difference should be calculable.…”
Section: Current-source Drive For Halo Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method of mitigating the damage done by these forces is the injection of a large quantity of a radiating impurity, such as argon, into a disrupting plasma to greatly lower the electron temperature to T e $ 10 eV and shorten the time of the current quench. 66,67 On DIII-D, the early injection of pellet of a radiating impurity both reduces the strength of the halo current and makes it more axisymmetric. 66 If radiating impurities were injected at too high a level into ITER, the plasma could terminate so rapidly that melting would occur on the first wall.…”
Section: Time Dependence Of Disruption Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MGI aims at spreading heat loads by radiating most of the plasma stored energy, preventing the generation of REs by increasing the electron density and controlling the CQ duration (in order to limit mechanical loads) by controlling the impurity content and thus the temperature and resistivity of the CQ plasma. A large body of experimental work on MGI exists, including experiments on JET, [6][7][8][9] ASDEX Upgrade, 10 Tore Supra, 11 DIII-D, 12 TEXTOR, 13 Alcator C-MOD, 14 and other devices. Results have shown the capability of MGI to fulfill part of the objectives of the ITER DMS, but not yet all of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the purpose of this paper, however, to study a fourth major disruption consequence: the phenomenon of "halo currents" [2,3,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The tokamak concept generally optimizes toward large elongation of the plasma cross-section, essentially due to the additional safety factor that such plasma boundary shaping provides [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: : Introduction and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halo currents have been characterized in a large number of conventional tokamak devices, including ALCATOR C-Mod [28], ASDEX-Upgrade [30,37,38], COMPASS-D [29], DIII-D [4,22,23,26,36], JET [24,31,32,33,35], and JT-60U [27]. These devices have generally shown large halo currents, with worst-case events having up to 50% of the predisruption plasma currents flowing into the vessel and plasma facing components [2].…”
Section: : Introduction and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%