2020
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-020-01442-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of anosmia and dysgeusia for diagnostic of COVID-19 in outpatients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
73
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…18,20,[24][25][26]29,32,34,37,[40][41][42][43][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] The remaining studies assessed olfactory ability through anamnestic data collection, simple surveys and/or structured, non-validated questionnaires (Table 4). 2,16,17,19,[21][22][23]27,28,30,31,33,35,36,38,39,[44][45][46]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,20,[24][25][26]29,32,34,37,[40][41][42][43][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] The remaining studies assessed olfactory ability through anamnestic data collection, simple surveys and/or structured, non-validated questionnaires (Table 4). 2,16,17,19,[21][22][23]27,28,30,31,33,35,36,38,39,[44][45][46]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, in our setting the percentage of females amongst healthcare professionals is high. On the other hand, sex matters in COVID‐19, in which males are more prone to present severe pulmonary disorders, while headache or anosmia may be more frequent in females 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among patients with flulike symptoms, the prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection may vary substantially according to geographic context and disease phase. For example, the study by Tostmann et al, conducted in The Netherlands during the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic, demonstrated a prevalence of 11% in SARS‐CoV‐2‒positive subjects among patients with a flulike illness, 7 whereas Zayet et al reported a prevalence of 44% in their cohort of patients evaluated in a French hospital 4 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its specificity is excellent, nasopharyngeal swab shows suboptimal sensitivity for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection in the early phase of infection being inconsistent during serial testing 3 . Moreover, patients developing COVID‐19‒related symptoms may be referred to nasopharyngeal swab later during the course of the disease when viral load is no longer detectable 4,5 . Thus, the diagnostic performance of new onset of smell and/or taste impairment for COVID‐19 may be even higher than estimated.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation