Contributing Forces in Entrepreneurship Research: A Global Citation Analysis

Xu, Nianhang; Fung, Anna; Chan, Kam C.

doi:10.1111/jsbm.12367

Cited by 14 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indiana University's Kelley School of Business has a long history of entrepreneurship education, emanating out of the Johnson Center for Entrepreneurship, led by Dr. Donald Kuratko, the Jack M. Gill Distinguished Chair of Entrepreneurship. A 12-year review of academic entrepreneurship research designed to identify leading scholars and universities ranked Indiana University's Kelley School of Business as having the greatest impact on the field of entrepreneurship (Xu, Chen, Fung, & Chan, 2018). A sample of the portfolio of innovative programs presently offered include: the Clapp IDEA Competitionda campus-wide idea competition that solicits novel ideas from across the campus; the "spine sweat" courseda semester-long effort to develop promising ventures that concludes with pitches to venture capitalists in Silicon Valley; and several other notable cocurricular entrepreneurship programs.…”

Section: Entrepreneurial Hustle: a Necessary Ingredient For Leadershimentioning

confidence: 99%

The COVID-19 Virtual Idea Blitz: Marshaling social entrepreneurship to rapidly respond to urgent grand challenges

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In response to societal grand challenges, professors have unique opportunities to effect change, repurposing their expertise to deploy relevant, timely, practical, and research-backed knowledge for the betterment of communities. Drawing on scholarship on postcrisis organizing, entrepreneurial hustle, and social entrepreneurship, we provide a firsthand, real-time case description of a three-day "virtual idea blitz" organized in response to the COVID-19 crisis. The event was organized and executed in less than a week and ultimately involved 200 individuals, including entrepreneurs, coders, medical doctors, venture capitalists, industry professionals, students, and professors from around the world. By the end of the weekend, 21 ideas with corresponding pitches were developed in five thematic areas: health needs, education, small businesses, community, and purchasing. We describe how the community was rapidly rallied, and we discuss the key learning outcomes of this spontaneous entrepreneurial endeavor. We provide evidence from participants and mentors that showcases the value of the time-compressed virtual idea blitz in accelerating social entrepreneurial action. We offer practical guidance to academic, community, and professional institutions that would like to replicate or build upon our approach to stimulate the formation of community and to coordinate efforts to thwart the ongoing threat of COVID-19, as well as other societal challenges that might emerge in the future.

show abstract

Section: Entrepreneurial Hustle: a Necessary Ingredient For Leadershimentioning

confidence: 99%

The COVID-19 Virtual Idea Blitz: Marshaling social entrepreneurship to rapidly respond to urgent grand challenges

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Specific to the interdisciplinary knowledge domain that CIM is subscribed to, bibliometric methods offer a viable way to synthesize and map heterogeneous research (Uddin, Khan, & Baur, 2015). Multiple topic-specific bibliometric studies are concerned with creativity (e.g., Castillo-Vergara, Alvarez-Marin, & Placencio-Hidalgo, 2018;Williams, Runco, & Berlow, 2016), innovation (e.g., Fagerberg, Fosaas, & Sapprasert, 2012;Shafique, 2013) or entrepreneurship (e.g., Landström, Harirchi, & Åström, 2012;Xu, Chen, Fung, & Chan, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

More than a quarter century of Creativity and Innovation Management: The journal's characteristics, evolution, and a look ahead

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When this journal was founded in 1992 by Tudor Rickards and Susan Moger, there was no academic outlet available that addressed issues at the intersection of creativity and innovation. From zero to 1,163 records, from the new kid on the block to one of the leading journals in creativity and innovation management has been quite a journey, and we would like to reflect on the past 28 years and the intellectual and conceptual structure of Creativity and Innovation Management (CIM). Specifically, we highlight milestones and influential articles, identify how key journal characteristics evolved, outline the (co‐)authorship structure, and finally, map the thematic landscape of CIM by means of a text‐mining analysis. This study represents the first systematic and comprehensive assessment of the journal's published body of knowledge and helps to understand the journal's influence on the creativity and innovation management community. We conclude by discussing future topics and paths of the journal as well as limitations of our approach.

show abstract

“…We have already noted that the focus of this paper is to analyze research problems in the field of entrepreneurship. Several authors have dealt with this theme so far (Rey-Martí, Ribeiro-Soriano & Palacios-Marqués, 2016;Alvarez-Garcia, Maldonado-Erazo, del Río & Sarang-Lalangue, 2018;López-Fernández Serrano Bedia & Pérez Pérez, 2016;Xu, Chen, Fung & Chan, 2018;Ferreira, Reis & Miranda, 2015;McDonald, Gan, Fraser, Oke & Anderson, 2015). In our paper, the author focused on the problems that are most studied and on the ones that are least studied in the field of entrepreneurship.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

What can we expect in the future of academic research? Most common research problems analysed in the top journals in the field of entrepreneurship

Đalić¹

2019

EurJ Appl Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the modern era of academic research, it is extremely difficult to define an entirely or largely unexplored research problem. Every researcher is faced with this question in their research. It takes a lot of work and effort to primarily find a topic that is relevant and that will be attractive for study and research. The focus of this paper is research problems related to the field of entrepreneurship. This paper deals with trending research problems over the course of the last five years in the field of entrepreneurship. The survey was conducted with the aim of identifying the least explored areas of entrepreneurship in order to predict future research topics. The methods used to achieve this scientific goal include: description, classification and explanation. By analyzing the sample of 393 papers from the five most cited journals in the field of entrepreneurship, the author came to the conclusion that in the past five years the majority of papers dealt primarily with the topic of innovation and advanced technology, and hardly touched upon the topic of women's entrepreneurship. This paper should help future researchers to select the topics or fields of research in the domain of entrepreneurship.

show abstract

Contributing Forces in Entrepreneurship Research: A Global Citation Analysis

Cited by 14 publications

References 46 publications

The COVID-19 Virtual Idea Blitz: Marshaling social entrepreneurship to rapidly respond to urgent grand challenges

The COVID-19 Virtual Idea Blitz: Marshaling social entrepreneurship to rapidly respond to urgent grand challenges

More than a quarter century of Creativity and Innovation Management: The journal's characteristics, evolution, and a look ahead

What can we expect in the future of academic research? Most common research problems analysed in the top journals in the field of entrepreneurship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About