Contribuições dos sistemas de informações no gerenciamento de riscos hospitalares: revisão integrativa da literatura

Pereira, Marta Cristiane Alves; Mello, Carolina Lima de; Camilo, Josana; Andrade, Luciane Sá de; Mazzotti, Diego R.

doi:10.18673/gs.v7i1.22089

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies have evaluated Health Information Systems from different perspectives, whether in the context of guidelines for developing countries (Ngugi et al, 2021), specific contexts and policies (Ahmadian et al, 2015), or even considering induced errors and performance quality (Yusof & Sahroni, 2018). In the Brazilian scenario, reviews consider the approach by institutional context, whether hospital (Pereira et al, 2016), primary care (Carreno et al, 2015), or the performance and quality of stored data (Correia et al, 2014).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Idealizing Information Systems for the Brazilian Unified Health System: Perspectives of Health Professionals

Alves,

Tourinho,

Almeida

et al. 2023

SAGE Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to understand, from the users of Health Information Systems’ perspectives, the essential components these technologies must present to be considered appropriate for incorporation and use in the Brazilian Unified Health System. As a secondary objective, we organized the results in the dimensions of the RE-AIM framework to facilitate future translation into practice. Qualitative exploratory research was carried out through a questionnaire with open-ended questions. We built the questions based on the RE-AIM and RE-AIM QuEST frameworks. For data organization and analysis, we used the NVivo 12® software, opting for the thematic categorical analysis strategy in three stages. Twenty-nine primary care and hospital services professionals participated, including nurses, physicians, pharmacists, dentists, community health workers, and management positions. Among the five dimensions of the framework used, sixteen analytical categories emerged. Constructs related to the interoperability between different healthcare services, implementation costs, infrastructure, reduction of bureaucracy, and guarantee of information security were deemed essential when considering implementing a new information system. The sustainability of technology in health services was directly associated with its performance quality to ensure that health professionals do not abandon the use of its functions.

show abstract