2020
DOI: 10.4000/lidil.7377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrastive vs Non-Contrastive Meta-Phonetic Input in Teaching Foreign Language Pronunciation

Abstract: de 80 adultes slovaques. La qualité de leur prononciation anglaise, telle qu'elle se reflète dans la structure des voyelles, est mesurée avant et après l'input contrastif dans le groupe expérimental et l'input non contrastif dans le groupe contrôle. Les valeurs sont ensuite comparées aux valeurs standard des voyelles de l'anglais britannique. On fait l'hypothèse que les voyelles anglaises produites par le groupe expérimental se rapprochent davantage des valeurs standard que les voyelles produites par le groupe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the way words sound does not always reflect their written form. Teaching and learning EFL (English as a foreign language) pronunciation is thus rather difficult, especially for speakers of phonemic languages with a systematic correspondence between letters and sounds (Kralova et al, 2020). In the English language, a grapheme can be pronounced in different ways, a grapheme cluster can be pronounced as one sound, or one phoneme is addressed by various graphemes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the way words sound does not always reflect their written form. Teaching and learning EFL (English as a foreign language) pronunciation is thus rather difficult, especially for speakers of phonemic languages with a systematic correspondence between letters and sounds (Kralova et al, 2020). In the English language, a grapheme can be pronounced in different ways, a grapheme cluster can be pronounced as one sound, or one phoneme is addressed by various graphemes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were able to come up with their own examples to create "families" of the same sound. The graphemes that tend to cause problems to Slovak learners because of native language interference were selected (Kralova, Nemcokova & Birova, 2020): a as in cat; ar as in car; al as in ball; sh as in fish; ch as in chin or school; th as in thin or father; ee as in week; ea as in mean; ng as in sing; wr as in wrap; kn as in knee; and final e changing the preceding vowel as in cake. Identical lesson plans were used in both groups, but a short reading practice followed by the Phonics instructions was introduced in the experimental group only to point out the Phonics rules and practice pronunciation.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%