2018
DOI: 10.1075/pbns.296.04lav
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrastive analysis of interactional discourse markers in English and Spanish newspaper texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that there was significantly higher stance markers than engagement markers in the corpus can be attributed to the journalistic nature of the editorials, which does not require real engagement with readers. This predominance of stance markers over engagement markers in both the USA and the UAE editorials has been reported by previous research (Lavid & Moratón, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fact that there was significantly higher stance markers than engagement markers in the corpus can be attributed to the journalistic nature of the editorials, which does not require real engagement with readers. This predominance of stance markers over engagement markers in both the USA and the UAE editorials has been reported by previous research (Lavid & Moratón, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Other studies of meta-discourse addressed media discourse and many registers such as editorials, opinion columns, and advertisements have been investigated (Al-Subhi, 2021, 2022Dafouz-Milne, 2008;Fu & Hyland, 2014;Le, 2004). More recent studies have looked at interactional meta-discourse and its specific features such as Khanbutayeva (2019), andLavid andMoratón (2018). Lavid and Moratón (2018) conducted a contrastive analysis of international meta-discourse markers in a sample of English and Spanish newspaper texts in three genres: news reports, editorials, and letters to the editor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation