2021
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2020.3032690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrastive Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Machine Remaining Useful Life Prediction

Abstract: Contrastive adversarial domain adaptation for machine remaining useful life prediction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hinchi et al used convolutional layers to directly extract local features from sensor data, combined them with LSTM layers to capture the degradation process of the bearing, and finally output the prediction values [23]. Whereas LSTM solves the problem of gradient disappearance of traditional RNN to some extent, the deliberate design of LSTM for RUL prediction is very time consuming [24,25].…”
Section: Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hinchi et al used convolutional layers to directly extract local features from sensor data, combined them with LSTM layers to capture the degradation process of the bearing, and finally output the prediction values [23]. Whereas LSTM solves the problem of gradient disappearance of traditional RNN to some extent, the deliberate design of LSTM for RUL prediction is very time consuming [24,25].…”
Section: Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 32 shows the working principle of TL [198]. The authors of [180] propose a novel transfer learning technique based on multiple layer perceptron (MLP) for dissimilar data distribution problems in RUL prediction of bearing machinery. However, many scopes to use selfsupervised learning [199] and self-supervised contrastive learning [200] algorithms are fine-tuned on limited data.…”
Section: Transfer Learning (Tl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the degradation trends are not the same for different bearings under the same conditions, resulting in significant data distribution discrepancies between entities. To overcome these problems, adversarial domain adaptation approaches and CNN-based health stage prediction methods have been proposed for RUL prediction [17,18,19,24]. The adversarial domain adaptation approaches have been proposed to generalize the feature extraction of bearing wear.…”
Section: Deep Learning and Adversarial Domain Adaptation For Rulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Da Costa et al [17] proposed a deep domain adaptation method for the RUL prediction by integrating the LSTM model with domain classification loss to reduce the deviation between source and target domains. Ragab et al [18,19] proposed a contrastive adversarial domain adaptation approach that enables automatic feature extraction and the RUL prediction from a source domain to a target domain. However, these approaches predict the RUL without determining the HS and FPT and only focus on the single-source single-target adaptation setting which is impractical because the network of domain adaptation should be trained for data from different domains with different distributions.…”
Section: Deep Learning and Adversarial Domain Adaptation For Rulmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation