2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-019-00831-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting use of habitat, landscape elements, and corridors by grey wolf and golden jackal in central Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the golden jackal was described as a species highly capable of exploiting anthropogenic resources and agricultural landscapes (Raichev et al 2013;Ćirović et al 2016;Shahnaseri et al 2019), our data showed that the key factor positively affecting species occurrence were natural habitats. Dense broadleaved vegetation, in particular, emerged as an important habitat, providing adequate resources, such as prey and den sites, as well as an adequate cover offering shelter from human persecution (Giannatos 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Even though the golden jackal was described as a species highly capable of exploiting anthropogenic resources and agricultural landscapes (Raichev et al 2013;Ćirović et al 2016;Shahnaseri et al 2019), our data showed that the key factor positively affecting species occurrence were natural habitats. Dense broadleaved vegetation, in particular, emerged as an important habitat, providing adequate resources, such as prey and den sites, as well as an adequate cover offering shelter from human persecution (Giannatos 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 km) in Conefor 2.6 85 . The dPC and dIIC indices are frequently used as connectivity measures in conservation prioritization studies 42,43,86,87 . The dIIC index considers both habitat amount and habitat reachability across the habitat network, and linkages as dispersal events between patches 84,86 .…”
Section: Connectivity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods have been used to assess landscape connectivity, including least-cost path modeling 35 , current flow 36 , factorial least-cost path density 37 , resistant kernels 38 and randomized shortest path algorithms 39 . The factorial least-cost path and cumulative resistant kernel approaches have been used in combination and the complementary information they provide have produced useful conservation tools 9 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 34 , 40 43 . In particular factorial least cost path and resistant kernel analysis incorporates scale dependence of dispersal ability, which is critical to produce accurate estimates of synoptic connectivity 40 , 44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connectivity modeling was developed adopting a factorial leastcost path [25] and a cumulative resistant kernel approach. Factorial least-cost path analysis was used to overcome the limitation of the least-cost path approach associated with the number of sources and target points and to produce a synoptic measure of landscape connectivity [5,26]. The resistant kernel approach shows the suitability of the whole landscape in supporting the movement of individuals [52].…”
Section: Modeling Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their ecological importance, most large carnivores suffered major declines in both population size and geographic range over the twentieth century [2]. The major causes of these declines were the loss and fragmentation of habitats, the decline of prey populations and the direct persecution by humans [3,4,5]. Nevertheless, in the last decades, a large-scale recovery of carnivore populations has occurred even within some of the most anthropized areas of the world, such as in Europe [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%