2017
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting Social and Cognitive Accounts on Overimitation: The Role of Causal Transparency and Prior Experiences

Abstract: Three experiments (N = 100) examine the influence of causal information on overimitation. In Experiment 1, a transparent reward location reveals that the reward is unaffected by nonfunctional actions. When 5-year-olds observe an inefficient and subsequently an efficient strategy to retrieve a reward, they show overimitation in both phases-even though the reward is visible. In Experiment 2, children observe first the efficient then the inefficient strategy. The latter is always demonstrated communicatively, whe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that such experience significantly influenced high-fidelity imitation of specific novel target acts demonstrated by the adult. These finding are in line with studies of self-experience involving Western children (Williamson et al, 2008;Williamson and Meltzoff, 2011;Wood et al, 2013;Schleihauf et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that such experience significantly influenced high-fidelity imitation of specific novel target acts demonstrated by the adult. These finding are in line with studies of self-experience involving Western children (Williamson et al, 2008;Williamson and Meltzoff, 2011;Wood et al, 2013;Schleihauf et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Results from a series of recent studies have suggested that preschool children's imitation of novel target acts is influenced by the children's own prior self-experience (Williamson et al, 2008;Williamson and Meltzoff, 2011;Wood et al, 2013;Schleihauf et al, 2018; see also Nielsen et al, 2012). For example, in Williamson et al's (2008) study, preschool children were randomly assigned to two prior-experience groups.…”
Section: Prior Self-experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that, where there is an afforded goal, any action in a modelled sequence can be treated as if it is associated with the goal, regardless of how implausible that might be (see also Schleihauf, Graetz, Pauen, & Hoehl, 2017).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, preschoolers imitate more after watching a live rather than televised demonstration (McGuigan, Whiten, Flynn, & Horner, ; Nielsen, Simcock, & Jenkins, ). They also imitate more when the model is present during their turn (Nielsen & Blank, ), when the model is socially communicative (Hoehl, Zettersten, Schleihauf, Grätz, & Pauen, ; Nielsen, ; Schleihauf, Graetz, Pauen, & Hoehl, ), when the model is an in‐group member (Buttelmann, Zmyj, Daum, & Carpenter, ; Gruber, Deschenaux, Frick, & Clément, ), and when primed with ostracism (Over & Carpenter, ; Watson‐Jones, Legare, Whitehouse, & Clegg, ; Watson‐Jones, Whitehouse, & Legare, ). The affiliative role of imitation is also evident in “synchronic imitation,” in which toddlers copy behavior in concert with their play partner as a way to participate in the interaction (Asendorpf, Warkentin, & Baudonnière, ; Eckerman, Davis, & Didow, ), or as a response toward parental socialization (Forman & Kochanska, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%