2009
DOI: 10.1890/08-1064.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting patterns of transgenerational plasticity in ecologically distinct congeners

Abstract: Stressful parental environments can influence offspring size and development either adaptively or maladaptively, yet little is known about species' differences in this complex aspect of phenotypic plasticity. We performed a reciprocal split-brood experiment to compare transgenerational plasticity in response to drought stress in two closely related annual plant species. We raised inbred replicate parent plants of eight genotypes per species in dry vs. moist soil to generate offspring of each genetic line that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
176
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
15
176
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, if an external stimulus constitutes a predictive cue of the impending change or degradation of offspring conditions ['adaptive matching' between maternal and offspring environments (Uller et al, 2013)], mothers may be able to buffer the likely negative impact of environmental variation on offspring performance by contributing to the interaction between offspring environment and phenotype. In most studies, the evolution of adaptive trans-generational plasticity has been documented when similar environmental conditions persist across generations, as scenarios where offspring were more likely to encounter the same environment as their mothers were usually considered (for example, early stages of offspring development) (Galloway and Etterson, 2007;Monaghan, 2008;Mousseau and Fox, 1998b;Sultan et al, 2009;Uller et al, 2013). However, in our study, we measured offspring responses in adult individuals, which can take up to 1 month to reach adulthood from the spawning of the eggs (Massamba-N'Siala et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if an external stimulus constitutes a predictive cue of the impending change or degradation of offspring conditions ['adaptive matching' between maternal and offspring environments (Uller et al, 2013)], mothers may be able to buffer the likely negative impact of environmental variation on offspring performance by contributing to the interaction between offspring environment and phenotype. In most studies, the evolution of adaptive trans-generational plasticity has been documented when similar environmental conditions persist across generations, as scenarios where offspring were more likely to encounter the same environment as their mothers were usually considered (for example, early stages of offspring development) (Galloway and Etterson, 2007;Monaghan, 2008;Mousseau and Fox, 1998b;Sultan et al, 2009;Uller et al, 2013). However, in our study, we measured offspring responses in adult individuals, which can take up to 1 month to reach adulthood from the spawning of the eggs (Massamba-N'Siala et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have also shown that the maternal abiotic environment can modulate seedling biomass allocation (Hovenden et al, 2008;Sultan et al, 2009). Warmer maternal environments have been found to produce offspring with greater RSR in a grass species (Hovenden et al, 2008).…”
Section: Maternal Environmental Effects On Sm Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The two maternal environments of the present study not only differed, however, in the temperature regime but also had extremely different edaphic properties (Cendán et al, 2012), with the warmer environment also having the best quality soils. According to this, one could expect that seedlings coming from the stressful environment would benefit from prioritizing allocation to roots rather than to shoots in order to favour the uptake of the limited edaphic resources of this environment (Moles and Westoby, 2006;Sultan et al, 2009), whereas those coming from the favourable environment would benefit from prioritizing the growth of the aerial part in order to increase competitive ability for light (Galloway and Etterson, 2007). The observed results, however, point in the opposite direction.…”
Section: Maternal Environmental Effects On Sm Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, if genetic bottlenecks limit an invading species' ability for local adaptive genetic differentiation, then phenotypic plasticity may facilitate those invasions by buffering against environmental stress (Rice and Mack 1991a;Ghalambor et al 2007). In addition to the more commonly considered within-generation adaptive plasticity, maternal environmental effects or transgenerational plasticity may further increase the capacity of a species to adapt to new habitats and thus facilitate invasive spread (Sultan et al 2009;Dyer et al 2010). Despite research focused on the role of genetic differentiation and plasticity of plant invaders at regional scales and across habitats (Rice and Mack 1991b;Sakai et al 2001;Sexton et al 2002), more information is needed concerning the evolutionary dynamics of invasive populations at the very local spatial scale (Parker et al 2003;Sexton et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%