Contrasting patterns in species richness of birds, butterflies and plants along riparian corridors in an urban landscape

Abstract

Aim Urbanization is a major driver of global land‐use change, substantially modifying patterns of biodiversity. Managing these impacts has become a conservation priority. The creation and maintenance of greenways, such as river corridors, is frequently promoted as a strategy for mitigating habitat fragmentation in urban areas by bringing semi‐natural habitat cover into city centres. However, there is little evidence to support this assertion. Here, we examine whether riparian zones maintain semi‐natural habitat cover in urban areas and how species richness varies along such zones. Location Sheffield, Northern England. Methods Multiple taxonomic groups (birds, butterflies, plants) were surveyed at 105 sites spanning seven riparian corridors that transect the study system. For all groups, we model the relationships between species richness and environmental variables pertinent to an urban system. To test whether riparian zones can act to maintain semi‐natural habitats within a city, we modelled the proportion of semi‐natural land cover within 250 m grid squares that do, and do not, contain a river. Results Species richness varied markedly in relation to distance from the urban core. Trends differed both between taxonomic groups and between rivers, reflecting the complex patterns of environmental variation associated with cities. This suggests that biodiversity surveys that focus on a single group or transect cannot reliably be used as surrogates even within the same city. Nonetheless, there were common environmental predictors of species richness. Plant, avian and butterfly richness all responded positively to Habitat Diversity and the latter two declined with increases in sealed surface. Main conclusions Multiple transects and taxonomic groups are required to describe species richness responses to urbanization as no single pattern is evident. Although riparian zones are an important component of the mosaic of urban habitats, we find that river corridors do not disproportionately support tree and Natural Surface Cover when compared to non‐riverine urban areas.

Can butterflies cope with city life? Butterfly diversity in a young megacity in southern China

“…Butterfly sampling, using sweep nets by two experienced butterfly collectors, was conducted during calm weather days between 09:00 and 15:00 to correspond with the peak flight activity period of butterflies (Koh and Sodhi 2004). We followed an active and centered search method (also known as timedsurveys) to allow a thorough search of different microhabitat plots, and to avoid biases due to differences in size and shape between parks (following Dallimer et al 2012;Kadlec et al 2012). During each sampling day, butterflies were sampled in the four microhabitat plots with our time equally divided between microhabitat types present (i.e., 45 min for each microhabitat type per sampling day).…”

Examining the Association between Physical Characteristics of Green Space and Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Ulsan, Korea

“…In particular, intense human activity/traffic and tall buildings that obstruct air movement contribute to the urban heat island (UHI) effect [3], and the intensity of the UHI effect is likely to increase in the context of global warming [1,4]. Previous studies have shown that the UHI effect significantly increases cooling energy in the summer [5][6][7], worsens air pollution [8][9][10], raises risks for early mortality [11], and deteriorates the living conditions of urban dwellers [12][13][14]. Accordingly, policy makers have attempted to mitigate the UHI effect with social, spatial, and environmental interventions.…”

Community heterogeneity of aquatic macroinvertebrates in urban ponds at a multi-city scale

“…Complex structural mosaics may limit dispersal to such an extent that macroinvertebrate communities in some urban ponds may be separated from any species pool effect (spatial effects) on local communities (Heino et al 2017). However, many urban ponds exist in networks, where they are linked through urban parks/nature reserves and blue/green corridors (Dallimer et al 2012;Hassall 2014). Even where there is high spatial connectivity and dispersal rates, species turnover may still be high as the local variation in environmental conditions has been shown to be the dominant structuring process for pond communities (Cottenie 2005).…”