2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
120
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although cryopreservation may entail some risks to the embryo, FET may provide an endometrium with increased receptivity, as compared to that after ovarian stimulation. The timing of the Bwindow of implantation( WOI) in stimulated cycles is complicated by the fact that it may be advanced or delayed, and therefore easily mistimed [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Shapiro et al [23] showed that the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer is significantly greater in the cryopreservation group than in the fresh group in normal responders and concluded that the difference was due to impaired endometrial receptivity in fresh embryo transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cryopreservation may entail some risks to the embryo, FET may provide an endometrium with increased receptivity, as compared to that after ovarian stimulation. The timing of the Bwindow of implantation( WOI) in stimulated cycles is complicated by the fact that it may be advanced or delayed, and therefore easily mistimed [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Shapiro et al [23] showed that the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer is significantly greater in the cryopreservation group than in the fresh group in normal responders and concluded that the difference was due to impaired endometrial receptivity in fresh embryo transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported higher implantation and pregnancy rates with day 5 versus day 6 BET However; in all published studies, comparisons were made between blastocysts that were expanded by day 5 and transferred on the same day, and those who had shown one-day delay in expansion and postponed to be transferred on day 6 [11][12][13]. Therefore; it remains unclear whether this is due to embryonic factor, endometrial factor, or better synchronization between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Вероятной причиной возникновения описанных негативных эффектов могут явиться су-прафизиологические уровни стероидных гормонов в периоде, предшествующем имплантации эмбриона [22][23][24]. Рост эндометрия в цикле переноса крио-консервированного эмбриона более управляем, чем в цикле ИСО [25]. Считается, что «окно импланта-ции» эндометрия закрывается тем раньше, чем выше уровень эстрогенов (эндогенных или экзогенных), и тем самым снижает время для успешной импланта-ции бластоцисты, а в цикле ИСО уровень эстрогенов значительно выше за счет множественного роста фолликулов [26].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified