2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2009.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting Late Cretaceous–Palaeocene lithostratigraphic successions across the Bibai Thrust, western Sulaiman Fold–Thrust Belt, Pakistan: Their significance in deciphering the early-collisional history of the NW Indian Plate margin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copley et al 2010) put an upper bound of ∼55 Ma for the initial collision of India with Asia in the region of the Sulaiman Range. Age constraints from faunal assemblages in the Katawaz Basin sediments of the northwestern Sulaiman Range, together with structural observations from field mapping, suggest that the Sulaiman Range was uplifted in the early Miocene, and that the major period of deformation began before the Pliocene (Hunting Survey Corporation Ltd 1960; Humayon et al 1991;Qayyum et al 1997;Kassi et al 2009;Kasi et al 2012). If we take ∼10-55 Ma as the range of possible ages of the Sulaiman Range, then the average viscosity required to reproduce the observed topography is 10 19 -10 20 Pa s. As discussed above, our model horizontal strain-rate field is consistent with the general spatial distribution of thrust and strike-slip earthquakes observed in the Sulaiman Range, and includes a zone of low strain rate in the interior of the model range comparable with the aseismic zone in the Sulaiman Range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Copley et al 2010) put an upper bound of ∼55 Ma for the initial collision of India with Asia in the region of the Sulaiman Range. Age constraints from faunal assemblages in the Katawaz Basin sediments of the northwestern Sulaiman Range, together with structural observations from field mapping, suggest that the Sulaiman Range was uplifted in the early Miocene, and that the major period of deformation began before the Pliocene (Hunting Survey Corporation Ltd 1960; Humayon et al 1991;Qayyum et al 1997;Kassi et al 2009;Kasi et al 2012). If we take ∼10-55 Ma as the range of possible ages of the Sulaiman Range, then the average viscosity required to reproduce the observed topography is 10 19 -10 20 Pa s. As discussed above, our model horizontal strain-rate field is consistent with the general spatial distribution of thrust and strike-slip earthquakes observed in the Sulaiman Range, and includes a zone of low strain rate in the interior of the model range comparable with the aseismic zone in the Sulaiman Range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is composed of a passive margin sequence of Mesozoic platform carbonates, sands, muds, shales and volcanics which show a deep-water affinity to the north. These deposits transition to younger siliciclastic sediments shed from the newly forming Himalaya from the Eocene onwards and deposited in a shallow-water deltaic environment analogous to the modern-day Indus delta-fan system (Eames 1951;Humayon et al 1991;Treloar & Izatt 1993;Qayyum et al 1996Qayyum et al , 2001Kassi et al 2009). The sedimentary sequence was deposited in a large basin off the western Indo-Pakistani subcontinent; the southwestern continuation of the remnant Neo-Tethys Ocean being consumed to the north throughout the early Cenozoic (Qayyum et al 1997).…”
Section: G E O L O G I C a L S E T T I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and second melting events occurred within the outcrops of the volcanogenic conglomerate of the Late Cretaceous Bibai Formation (Kazmi 1979;Khan et al 2000;Kassi et al 2009) of the western Sulaiman Fold-Thrust Belt, which comprises mostly sedimentary successions ( Figure 1; Table 1 (Kazmi 1979;Siddiqui et al 1996;Khan et al 2000;Mahoney et al 2002;Kassi et al 2009). The belt occurred as result of collision of the Eurasian and Indian plates; therefore, it is tectonically and seismically active (Ambraseys & Bilham 2003).…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Tor Zawar Mountain, Ziarat District, the steel pylons are installed directly over a thick succession of the volcanogenic conglomerate of the Late Cretaceous Bibai Formation (Kazmi 1979;Khan et al 2000;Kassi et al 2009), which is composed of over 95% of basaltic boulders. In the Jang Tor Ghar, however, the affected steel pylon of the electric transmission line is installed over the alluvium, comprising mostly ultramafic fragments of the Muslim Bagh Ophiolites.…”
Section: Field Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discussed the regional and local geology, volcanological aspects, petrography and majorelement and trace-element contents of a few samples and proposed a possible mode of origin for this material. We wish to clarify aspects of the geological framework of the area and to comment on the possible mode of genesis of these rocks on the basis of our own extensive field work in the area (Khan et al, 2000;Kassi et al, 2009). We also add observations of another similar event that occurred almost a year later (in January 2011), about 300 m north of the first occurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%