2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00394.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting interference functions and foraging dispersion in two species of shorebird (Charadrii)

Abstract: Summary1. Above a threshold density of I 100 birds ha -1 , strong interference occurred between redshank Tringa totanus (Linnaeus) feeding by sight on the amphipod crustacean Corophium volutator (Pallas). No aggressive interactions occurred between the birds and the probable cause was prey depression. 2. Redshank fed in a square metre of mud that had recently been exploited by another redshank much less often than would be expected by chance. By avoiding areas where prey would have been recently exploited, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(59 reference statements)
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced intake rate in shorebirds eating prey that could retreat into a burrow may imply that this antipredator behaviour is effective in reducing intake rate in shorebirds, and also introduces the possibility that interference through prey depression may have occurred in our sample (Yates, Stillman & Goss-Custard, 2000). Interference from intra-specific and inter-specific kleptoparasitism may also have occurred.…”
Section: Discussion (1 ) Phylogenetic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The reduced intake rate in shorebirds eating prey that could retreat into a burrow may imply that this antipredator behaviour is effective in reducing intake rate in shorebirds, and also introduces the possibility that interference through prey depression may have occurred in our sample (Yates, Stillman & Goss-Custard, 2000). Interference from intra-specific and inter-specific kleptoparasitism may also have occurred.…”
Section: Discussion (1 ) Phylogenetic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Values given in bold are statistically significant inactive may remain closer to the surface and more active during low tide. The intake rate of redshank foraging on Corophium volutator is reduced when the latter retreat down their burrows (Selman & Goss-Custard 1988, Yates et al 2000. Thus, although the absolute abundance of e.g.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bird species differ in their body and fat store sizes, daily energy requirements, the size ranges of each food consumed, their intake rates from different foods and their susceptibility to intraspecific interference through food-fighting or prey depression (e.g. Yates et al 2000). Individuals within a species differ in their foraging efficiency and dominance, which influences susceptibility to interference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of conspecific competitors on a bird's intake rate was incorporated using the following interference function : (3) where IR = intake rate (mg s -1 for all systems in which interference was assumed to occur, as this is the approximate threshold in a number of systems in which interference occurs through either kleptoparasitism , Triplet et al 1999 or a reduction in prey availability due to prey-avoidance behaviour (prey depression; e.g. Yates et al 2000). The aggregation factor accounts for the fact that birds will usually be aggregated in a patch, rather than spread uniformly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation