Contrasting effects of GPS device and harness attachment on adult survival of Lesser Black‐backed Gulls Larus fuscus and Great Skuas Stercorarius skua

Abstract

Telemetry has become an important method for studying the biology and ecology of animals. However, the impact of tracking devices and their method of attachment on different species across multiple temporal scales has seldom been assessed. We compared the behavioural and demographic responses of two species of seabird, Lesser Black‐backed Gull Larus fuscus and Great Skua Stercorarius skua, to a GPS device attached using a crossover wing harness. We used telemetry information and monitoring of breeding colonies to compare birds equipped with a device and harness, and control birds without an attachment. We assessed whether tagged birds have lower short‐term breeding productivity or lower longer term overwinter return rates (indicative of overwinter survival) than controls. For Great Skua, we also assessed whether territory attendance within the breeding season differed between tagged and control birds. As with previous studies on Lesser Black‐backed Gull, we found no short‐term impacts on breeding productivity or long‐term impacts on overwinter return rates. For Great Skua, there was no evidence for impacts of the device and harness on territory attendance or breeding productivity. However, as found by a previous study of Great Skuas using a different (body) harness design, there was strong evidence of reduced overwinter return rates. Consequently, a device attached using a wing harness was considered suitable for long‐term deployment on Lesser Black‐backed Gulls, but not on Great Skuas. These findings will inform the planning of future tracking studies.

A simple topographical model to predict Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos space use during dispersal

“…All transmitters were fitted using a harness of 13-mm Teflon Ribbon (Bally Ribbon Mills, Bally, PA, USA) using an 'X harness method', otherwise described as a 'crossover wing harness' (Thaxter et al 2016). Fitting involved a breakaway feature within the harnesses by stitching through ribbons with either cotton or linen thread at the central point over the sternum (Kenward 1987(Kenward , 2001, which are intended to remain attached for the expected 3-5 year juvenile dispersal period of this species (Urios et al 2007, Watson 2010) and manufacturer's expected transmitter lifespan.…”

Shifting individual habitat specialization of a successful predator living in anthropogenic landscapes

“…Age was determined from plumage characteristics. Incubating birds were caught at the nest using a walk-in wire mesh trap and devices were attached using a wing harness fixed with a reef knot in the tracheal pit, an attachment method recommended for large gulls (see Thaxter et al 2014Thaxter et al , 2016. The GPS logger and harness weighed less than 1.8% of the body mass of the birds (19 g for the GPS versus 1062 ± 120 g [mean ± SD] for the tracked gulls), less than the 3 to 5% threshold suggested for seabirds (Phillips et al 2003, Passos et al 2010.…”

A probabilistic algorithm to process geolocation data

“…Indeed, geolocators are used very frequently on nonbreeding seabirds, because long-term deployment of satellite or GPS devices using harnesses is a major welfare concern (e.g. [6]) and also on other marine organisms, including fish, that rarely, if ever, are at the sea surface and so cannot be tracked using radio wave technology. Currently, miniaturized GPS loggers in the same weight range as geolocators record few locations throughout the deployment period; thus, the data are unsuitable for answering ecological questions on finer temporal scales.…”