2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting decay rates of freshwater bivalves’ shells: Aquatic versus terrestrial habitats

Abstract: a b s t r a c tFreshwater flow regimes are particularly vulnerable to global climate change with changes to the volume and regime of water contributing to global declines in freshwater biodiversity. Droughts or floods can cause massive mortalities of freshwater bivalves, facilitating the accumulation of shells in the aquatic but also in adjacent terrestrial habitats. In order to fully understand the long term impact of these massive mortality events, it is important to assess how bivalve shells persist in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unique exception were some C. fluminea juveniles (whole individuals) found in the gut contents of a few Salmo truta fario specimens (Ilarri et al, 2014). Beyond the fact that C. fluminea present the shells as a physical defence, it is important to state also that their shells are harder when compared to other bivalve species present in Minho River with the exception of Potomida littoralis (Ilarri et al, 2015). This situation may be the main reason for the avoidance of this species as a prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique exception were some C. fluminea juveniles (whole individuals) found in the gut contents of a few Salmo truta fario specimens (Ilarri et al, 2014). Beyond the fact that C. fluminea present the shells as a physical defence, it is important to state also that their shells are harder when compared to other bivalve species present in Minho River with the exception of Potomida littoralis (Ilarri et al, 2015). This situation may be the main reason for the avoidance of this species as a prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to consider that the subsequent effects of climatic extremes may have opposite trends and negative feedback processes (IPCC, 2014). For instance, a massive die-off of bivalves after droughts (Ilarri et al, 2011) and floods (Sousa et al, 2012), may lead to a significant increase on the quantity of empty shells in the river bottom that might be used for P. microps reproduction in the next breeding season, which may led to an increase in the population density after one or more generations due to the persistence of these shells in the system for years (Ilarri et al, 2015b). Actually, the reproduction of common gobies seems to be limited by the presence of nest substrates (Nyman, 1953;Magnhagen, 1998) and their abundance and availability can directly influence the number of breeding males (Breitburg, 1987;Lindström, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern, live community is the single source for less-degraded shells, whereas reworked fossils and fluvial processes both contribute to higher TT scores in death assemblages. Freshwater bivalves likely undergo similar reworking, though this may be complicated by their range of life modes, poor preservation of shell material (particularly of taphonomically nonrobust mussels), and other biological/ecological differences (Cummins 1994;Newell et al 2007;Wolverton et al 2010;Ilarri et al 2015Ilarri et al , 2019Martello et al 2018).…”
Section: Death Assemblage Taphonomic Provenance and Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%