2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting behaviour of cadmium and zinc in a soil–plant–arthropod system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, they can exert a modicum of control over the accumulation of Cd. Nevertheless, the contrast in results between the present study and that of Crawford et al (1995) and Green et al (2006) suggests that regulation of Cd by this mechanism may not apply to all aphid species.…”
Section: Alonso Et Al 2009)contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, they can exert a modicum of control over the accumulation of Cd. Nevertheless, the contrast in results between the present study and that of Crawford et al (1995) and Green et al (2006) suggests that regulation of Cd by this mechanism may not apply to all aphid species.…”
Section: Alonso Et Al 2009)contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that aphids exert little control over their uptake of Cd (Crawford et al 1995) and that Cd concentration in the shoot is the predominant factor determining Cd concentration in aphids (Green et al 2006). It is apparent that if the plant restricts transfer of Cd to the shoot, then transfer through the higher trophic levels of the food chain must also be restricted, as seen in the case of Zn in the present study.…”
Section: Alonso Et Al 2009)mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of an association between the concentration of Cd extracted from soil by a neutral salt and the concentration in plant shoots is at variance with the findings of other studies (Häni & Gupta, 1984;Sauerbeck & Stypereck, 1984;Mellum, Arnesen, & Singh, 1998). Whilst the concentration of Cd in plant roots may reflect the extractable concentration in the soil, this may not hold true for the shoots because restricted translocation within the plant can result in a non-linear relationship between root and shoot concentration (Salt et al, 1995;Hamon et al, 1999;Green, Jeffries, Diaz, & Tibbett, 2006). This mechanism may have mediated the effect of increased extractable Cd in the soil and prevented Cd transfer to higher trophic levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Secondly, animals can also be exposed to pollutants taken up from the soil by plants, which are subsequently translocated to the shoots. Although the root-shoot barrier generally excludes PTMs from the shoot, this is not always the case and PTM concentrations higher than in the soil may be found in shoots (Sauerbeck, 1991;Green et al, 2006). Consequently, there can be elevated concentrations of PTMs in the shoots of plants growing on landfills (Murphy et al, 2000;Hernández et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%