2012
DOI: 10.1002/qj.1963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting aerosol characteristics and radiative forcing over Hyderabad, India due to seasonal mesoscale and synoptic‐scale processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…water soluble, insoluble and soot) were used in the urban aerosol model as described in Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds (OPAC; Hess et al, 1998). The BC number density corresponding to online BC mass concentrations is incorporated in OPAC and number concentrations of water soluble and insoluble aerosols are iteratively adjusted to obtain the best fit (uncertainty within ±5%) between measured and modelled spectral AODs Sinha et al, 2012). The aerosol optical properties (AOD, SSA and g) were estimated with and without inclusion of BC in OPAC and then are inserted in SBDART.…”
Section: Radiative Impact Of Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…water soluble, insoluble and soot) were used in the urban aerosol model as described in Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds (OPAC; Hess et al, 1998). The BC number density corresponding to online BC mass concentrations is incorporated in OPAC and number concentrations of water soluble and insoluble aerosols are iteratively adjusted to obtain the best fit (uncertainty within ±5%) between measured and modelled spectral AODs Sinha et al, 2012). The aerosol optical properties (AOD, SSA and g) were estimated with and without inclusion of BC in OPAC and then are inserted in SBDART.…”
Section: Radiative Impact Of Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From normal to foggy day, there is increase in lower wavelength α, and this increase is higher than the decrease in higher wavelength α (and entire wavelength α). This indicates that during the foggy day the size of the fine-mode aerosols decrease, suggesting additional transport of freshly emitted aerosols, mostly from urban and industrialized regions; concurrently, an increase in coarse-mode abundance is revealed due to slightly lower α 0.675-1.02 that indicates a little lower fine-to-coarse mode ratio (Sinha et al, 2012). During the foggy period, there is ultra-fine aerosol formation by gas-to-particle conversion in nucleation mode (< 0.1 µm), as was observed over IGB urban areas (Ganguly et al, 2006;Das et al, 2008), which results in higher α in the shorter wavelengths.…”
Section: Variation In Aerosol Optical Depthmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Angstrom exponent (α) was calculated from the measured spectral AODs over Sundarban during the foggy and normal days. α is the slope of AOD versus wavelength in logarithmic scale and provides information about the size distribution of aerosols where higher (lower) α represents dominance of relatively smaller (bigger) particles (Das et al, 2008;Sinha et al, 2012). In the present study, α was calculated in the lower (0.38 to 0.50 µm), higher (0.675 to 1.02 µm) and entire (0.38 to 1.02 µm) wavelength range and is found to be 0.6 ± 0.1, 1.2 ± 0.2 and 1.0 ± 0.1, respectively, on normal day and 0.8 ± 0.1, 1.1 ± 0.3 and 0.9 ± 0.2, respectively, on the foggy day.…”
Section: Variation In Aerosol Optical Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PM 2.5 concentration is closely related to moisture in the 3 sampling times, whereas Yile (2017) points out that a lower wind speed in the lower atmosphere reduces transport he dispersion of aerosols increases the accumulation of aerosols near their sources and increases the local concentrations of aerosols. Dumka et al (2013Dumka et al ( , 2015 note that in addition to seasonal variability, mass concentrations of PM 2.5 also exhibit pronounced diurnal patterns, strongly related to the combined effects of local emissions, meteorology and boundary layer dynamics. However, the effect of wind dynamics is identified as the main actor of dust uplift (Tiwari et al, 2017).…”
Section: Variables (Axes F1 Et F2: 9908 %)mentioning
confidence: 99%