2017
DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i4.378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast use in relation to the arterial access site for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract: AIMTo compare the amount of contrast used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via trans-radial access (TRA) vs trans-femoral access (TFA).METHODSScientific databases and websites were searched for:randomizedcontrolledtrials (RCTs). Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and was summarized as the weighted mean difference (WMD) of contrast used with a 95%CI using a random-effects model.RESULTSThe meta-analysis included 13 RCTs with a total of 3165 patients. There was no difference between t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, increasing amounts of contrast are associated with an increasing likelihood of developing AKI especially in those with impaired renal function [8]. It has been suggested that overall larger amounts of contrast are used with FA access, but this was not found in a metaanalysis of randomized trials comparing contrast use between RA and FA access [35]. Before adjustment, our FA group had approximately 15 ml more contrast used, but after adjustment, this was reduced to approximately 6 ml, an amount unlikely to have a clinical efect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, increasing amounts of contrast are associated with an increasing likelihood of developing AKI especially in those with impaired renal function [8]. It has been suggested that overall larger amounts of contrast are used with FA access, but this was not found in a metaanalysis of randomized trials comparing contrast use between RA and FA access [35]. Before adjustment, our FA group had approximately 15 ml more contrast used, but after adjustment, this was reduced to approximately 6 ml, an amount unlikely to have a clinical efect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits for use of CMR (gender neutral evidence) CMR provides significant incremental value to conventional tests in establishing an accurate diagnosis [ 25 27 ] and prognosis in ACS [ 28 ]. CMR plays an important role in the contemporary assessment and prognosis of MINOCA [ 26 , 29 31 ].…”
Section: Imaging Females With Acute Coronary Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%