2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Optimization in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Validation in a Swine Model

Abstract: A new combined diluted test bolus and CT angiography protocol was shown to improve coronary enhancement and CNR as compared to an existing standard CT angiography protocol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable time delays between V1 and V2 for the low-dose acquisitions were also estimated from the reference standard acquisitions, which is clinically unrealistic. Consequently, each time delay can be determined with a diluted test bolus and single slice CINE scanning [ 36 ], with only slight increases in contrast and radiation dose. The proper time delay may also be estimated as a function of the contrast injection time plus a fixed dispersion time [ 37 ], where the accuracy of perfusion measurement is maintained as long as the V2 volume scan is acquired within approximately ± 2 cardiac cycles of the true peak of the aortic enhancement [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variable time delays between V1 and V2 for the low-dose acquisitions were also estimated from the reference standard acquisitions, which is clinically unrealistic. Consequently, each time delay can be determined with a diluted test bolus and single slice CINE scanning [ 36 ], with only slight increases in contrast and radiation dose. The proper time delay may also be estimated as a function of the contrast injection time plus a fixed dispersion time [ 37 ], where the accuracy of perfusion measurement is maintained as long as the V2 volume scan is acquired within approximately ± 2 cardiac cycles of the true peak of the aortic enhancement [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, the low-dose technique derives perfusion using the integrated change in HU within the entire myocardium over time; thus, the impact of motion on the accuracy of perfusion measurement was not significant. Still, despite optimal CTA acquisition at the peak of the aortic enhancement [ 36 , 37 ], the impact of motion combined with metal artifacts from the angioplasty balloons and wires significantly reduced coronary image quality, preventing morphological cross-sectional assessment of the stenoses. However, such motion and metal artifacts were not significant enough to prevent coronary centerline extraction; hence, the accuracy of minimum-cost-path myocardial assignment was unaffected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous report has shown that accurate perfusion measurements can be made using the FPA technique for different timing protocols of the first (V1) and second (V2) volume scans [34]. Furthermore, a diluted test-bolus technique [35] was also reported to prospectively determine the timing for the two-volume scans, however, with slightly increased contrast and radiation dose. By injecting the same amount of diluted contrast as the actual contrast bolus, Dynamic pulmonary CT perfusion using first-pass analysis technique with only two volume scans the contrast arrival timing (V1) and maximal enhancement timing (V2) can be monitored and used for the prospective FPA volume scans [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum delay of 10 minutes was again employed during each acquisition delay. Of note, during each delay, the time (Δt) between V1 and V2 was estimated from the prior reference acquisition using automatic time-density-curve analysis (Acquilion One; Canon Medical Systems, Tustin, CA) and was used, in place of a diluted test bolus 25 or an empirically derived time delay, 26 for proper timing of the subsequent prospective 2-volume FPA perfusion acquisition. After each delay, contrast material and a saline chaser were injected as described previously, and low-dose, 2-mm slab, dynamic bolus tracking at 100 kVp and 50 mA (SureStart; Aquilion One, Canon Medical Systems, Tustin, CA) was performed, where V1 was acquired after the aortic enhancement exceeded 140 HU above the baseline blood pool intensity while V2 was acquired after V1 using the previously estimated time delay, Δt.…”
Section: Prospective Fpa Perfusion Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Another limitation was proper prospective acquisition of V2 at approximately the peak of the aortic enhancement. 22,23,25 For the purposes of this study, the optimal time delay (Δt) between V1 and V2 to capture V2 at the peak was estimated from the reference standard retrospective acquisition before each subsequent prospective acquisition. Although such a scheme is clinically unrealistic, fortunately, the optimal time delay can also be derived through the preemptive use of a low-dose diluted test bolus acquisition, as previously validated.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%