2003
DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200343020-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast Sensitivity and Limits of Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in an effort to offset all [51,52] or part [53,54] of the individual eye's corneal SA, while not overcompensating and thereby inducing whole-eye negative SA, given that a wide range of corneal SA has been reported. In individual patients, depending on their uncorrected defocus term and other higher-order aberrations, either positive or negative residual spherical aberration can have a deleterious effect on image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in an effort to offset all [51,52] or part [53,54] of the individual eye's corneal SA, while not overcompensating and thereby inducing whole-eye negative SA, given that a wide range of corneal SA has been reported. In individual patients, depending on their uncorrected defocus term and other higher-order aberrations, either positive or negative residual spherical aberration can have a deleterious effect on image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure visual quality or functional vision, a contrast sensitivity test is required. [6][7][8][9][10] Certain diseases cause isolated loss of contrast sensitivity, even when visual acuity is normal, and others can lead to loss of contrast sensitivity that is more pronounced than the loss of visual acuity. 11 In these cases, the results of a contrast sensitivity test can help clinicians better understand a patient's impairment, make an accurate diagnosis, monitor the efficacy of treatment, and modify treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no universally accepted standard or interpretation for contrast sensitivity or glare disability testing. 3,4 Given the inadequacy of these tests, questionnaires such as the Visual Function 14 (VF-14) were developed to quantify the functional disability of patients with cataract and other vision-limiting diseases. 5,6 The current Preferred Practice Patterns state that ''the primary indication for surgery is visual function that no longer meets the patient's needs.''…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%