2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast sensitivities in the Gaia Data Release 2

Abstract: The source detection sensitivity of Gaia is reduced near sources. To characterise this contrast sensitivity is important for understanding the completeness of the Gaia data products, in particular when evaluating source confusion in less well resolved surveys, such as in photometric monitoring for transits. Here, we statistically evaluate the catalog source density to determine the Gaia Data Release 2 source detection sensitivity as a function of angular separation and brightness ratio from a bright source. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of this approach is that the sources in the chance alignment catalog, being nearby and having precise parallaxes, are more representative of objects in the binary catalog. Unsurprisingly -since it was verified in ER18 that there are no strong trends in contrast sensitivity with apparent magnitude or source density; see also Brandeker & Cataldi (2019) -the improved constraints are fairly similar to those derived in ER18. We compare them in Figure D4.…”
Section: D2 Contrast Sensitivity For Close Pairssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage of this approach is that the sources in the chance alignment catalog, being nearby and having precise parallaxes, are more representative of objects in the binary catalog. Unsurprisingly -since it was verified in ER18 that there are no strong trends in contrast sensitivity with apparent magnitude or source density; see also Brandeker & Cataldi (2019) -the improved constraints are fairly similar to those derived in ER18. We compare them in Figure D4.…”
Section: D2 Contrast Sensitivity For Close Pairssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…comparing the two point correlation function of chance alignments to what would be expected in the absence of crowding/blending effects (e.g. Arenou et al 2018;Brandeker & Cataldi 2019). Of course, the sensitivity to companions in a particular catalog depends on the quality cuts imposed: cuts that remove objects with somewhat contaminated photometry will lower the sensitivity.…”
Section: D2 Contrast Sensitivity For Close Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ziegler et al 2018and Brandeker & Cataldi (2019) have mapped the completeness limit close to bright stars to be ∆G ∼ 6 mag at ρ = 2 , ∆G ∼ 8 mag at ρ = 3 , and ∆G ∼ 10 mag at ρ = 6 . The evolutionary models of Baraffe et al (2015) would imply corresponding physical limits of M ∼ 0.20M at ρ = 250 AU, M ∼ 0.085M at ρ = 375 AU, and M ∼ 0.050M at ρ = 750 AU.…”
Section: Limits On Additional Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolving power of the Gaia instrument of two sources that lie close together in the sky mainly depends on the angular separation and the magnitude difference (de Bruijne et al 2015) and is called contrast sensitivity, see Brandeker & Cataldi (2019) for a Gaia DR2 determination. In dense regions we especially lose faint sources due to this effect (Rybizki et al 2020), which directly affects our ability to resolve resolve binaries.…”
Section: Contrast Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%