Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies showed that CEUS can further improve identification of SLN and reduce SLNB surgical trauma [23][24][25][26]. However, some studies suggested that the false negative rate of SLNB guided by CEUS alone is high and the diagnostic accuracy is low [27,28]. Since the difference in accuracy of assessing axillary status between CEUS-guided SLNB and conventional SLNB is not clear, this meta-analysis reviews the reported studies focusing on SLNB guided by CEUS, further analyzes the difference in the positive rate between SLNs identified by CEUS and SLNs identified not by CEUS, and also analyzes the accuracy of SLN identified by CEUS in diagnosing the pathological status of overall axillary sentinel nodes, in order to explore whether CEUS can further improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy.…”
Section: Ultrasonography and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies showed that CEUS can further improve identification of SLN and reduce SLNB surgical trauma [23][24][25][26]. However, some studies suggested that the false negative rate of SLNB guided by CEUS alone is high and the diagnostic accuracy is low [27,28]. Since the difference in accuracy of assessing axillary status between CEUS-guided SLNB and conventional SLNB is not clear, this meta-analysis reviews the reported studies focusing on SLNB guided by CEUS, further analyzes the difference in the positive rate between SLNs identified by CEUS and SLNs identified not by CEUS, and also analyzes the accuracy of SLN identified by CEUS in diagnosing the pathological status of overall axillary sentinel nodes, in order to explore whether CEUS can further improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy.…”
Section: Ultrasonography and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 16 selected studies, 9 used SonoVue as CEUS material [26][27][28][39][40][41][42][43][44], 6 used Sonazoid [23][24][25][45][46][47], and 1 used DEFINITY [48]. The administration sites and methods of contrast agents mainly include intradermal [23-28, 39-44, 47] and subcutaneous [45,46] injection around areola or peritumoral parenchyma injection approaching the axilla [48].…”
Section: The Localization Detection Rate Of Ceus For Slnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations