2013
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a meta‐analysis

Abstract: The results of this meta-analysis support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions selecting patients who need further diagnostics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
102
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
6
102
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the characterization of specific FLLs, the overall sensitivity for the diagnosis of hemangioma (612 hemangiomas from 20 studies) was 86% and for the diagnosis of FNH (365 FNHs from 18 studies) was 88%. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC (1333 HCCs from 19 studies) was 88% and for the diagnosis of metastases (828 metastases from 18 studies) was 91% [12]. The conclusion of this meta-analysis is to support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the characterization of specific FLLs, the overall sensitivity for the diagnosis of hemangioma (612 hemangiomas from 20 studies) was 86% and for the diagnosis of FNH (365 FNHs from 18 studies) was 88%. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC (1333 HCCs from 19 studies) was 88% and for the diagnosis of metastases (828 metastases from 18 studies) was 91% [12]. The conclusion of this meta-analysis is to support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…As the final argument in favor of the use of CEUS for the evaluation of FLL we propose a recently published meta-analysis [12], for which literature databases were searched up to March 2012. Inclusion criteria were evaluation of CEUS in FLLs, assessment of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to contrast agents used for CT or MRI, second generation US contrast agents are able to show tissue perfusion, and, based on enhancement patterns in arterial, portal, and late vascular phases, to identify different types of FLLs. The value of CEUS in diagnosing FLLs was demonstrated in two national multicentre studies (a German and a French one) [2,3], each including more than 1000 FLL, while CEUS accuracy was proved to be similar to those of contrast enhanced CT and MRI [4,5]. Furthermore, in 2004 the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) issued Guidelines and Recommendations concerning the use of CEUS [6] revised in 2008 [7] and in 2012 [8], the later developed in cooperation with the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB), thus with universal valability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEUS can therefore depict macro-and microvascularization [17][18][19]. As a general statement, the occurence of hypoenhancement of solid liver lesions in the late and post-vascular phases signals malignancy with high accuracy in non cirrhotic livers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%