1999
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast-enhanced helical CT for pulmonary embolism detection: inter- and intraobserver agreement among radiologists with variable experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
29
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore the accuracy of CTPA for peripheral pulmonary embolisms is not excellent. The a radiological finding of peripheral pulmonary embolism has a moderate interobserver agreement whit a kappa of 0.47, and the positive predictive value of apparent isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolisms is reported to be as low as 25% (9,21). Coupled with an increased complication rate from anticoagulation therapy this gives cause for concern (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the accuracy of CTPA for peripheral pulmonary embolisms is not excellent. The a radiological finding of peripheral pulmonary embolism has a moderate interobserver agreement whit a kappa of 0.47, and the positive predictive value of apparent isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolisms is reported to be as low as 25% (9,21). Coupled with an increased complication rate from anticoagulation therapy this gives cause for concern (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction in scan collimation permits a decrease in the volumeaveraging effect between parenchyma, vessel walls, and blood, responsible for areas of low attenuation which may be confused with PE on transverse CT scans. Such partial identification of vessels may create false-positive and false-negative results or lead the observer to an indeterminate answer [13]. Using thin-collimation and subsecond single-slice CT, Remy-Jardin et al have previously reported significant improvement in image quality due to a higher spatial resolution, resulting from a higher rate of analyzable segmental pulmonary arteries and a reduction in interpretive difficulties due to volume averaging [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies report high accuracies, with sensitivity and specificity greater than 90%-95% (15), but results vary widely between studies (16) and are confounded by the lack of an accurate gold standard and consequent verification bias. Moreover, there is significant interobserver disagreement as demonstrated by only moderate agreement, with a k of 0.47 for 3-mm-collimation CTPA (17). Many practitioners fail to realize the limitations of imaging tests, leading to both overdiagnosis and a delay in treatment, particularly when there is discordance between clinical pretest likelihood and the imaging result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%