2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast and propositional attitude: A relevance theoretic analysis of contrast connectives in Spanish and English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study concludes that the examination of tokens of language use (such as discourse markers) is not merely an optional activity in the process of linguistic theory making. Olmos and Ahern (2008) revise previous analyses of but and although formulated within a relevance theoretical framework and offer a new perspective on their functions based on cross-linguistic data. These connectives had been described in terms of effort-saving devices that lead the addressee to suspend or eliminate assumptions.…”
Section: Discourse Markersmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study concludes that the examination of tokens of language use (such as discourse markers) is not merely an optional activity in the process of linguistic theory making. Olmos and Ahern (2008) revise previous analyses of but and although formulated within a relevance theoretical framework and offer a new perspective on their functions based on cross-linguistic data. These connectives had been described in terms of effort-saving devices that lead the addressee to suspend or eliminate assumptions.…”
Section: Discourse Markersmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This role is clearly shown in all of its occurrences, including the following: Concerning the third most frequent concessive discourse marker, wa, it is evident that it also plays the same role in reducing the processing effort for the speaker and maximizing the contextual effect for the listener needed to derive implicature, and thus, maximizes its optimal relevance. procedural expression since it guides the listener when searching for relevance in utterance interpretation by constraining the choice of contextual information and the cognitive effects that can be obtained (Olmos and Ahern, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, for Olmos and Ahern (2009) the common denominator in the interpretation of both adversative and concessive clauses is the notion of 'contrast' or 'opposition'. Yet, the distinction that Olmos and Ahern attempt to draw between the two examples above is that what but introduces as an adversative connective marks a contrast with an assumption already accessible in the context, while the clause introduced by the concessive although leads to an expectation inferred to hold, which the main clause is contrasted with.…”
Section: Opposition In Concessionmentioning
confidence: 99%