“…Whereas some TMs have been well described, such as quant à (Fløttum, 1999, 2003; Debaisieux, 2001; Choi-Jonin, 2003; Anscombre, 2006; Lagae, 2003, 2007c, 2011b, see also Prévost, 2003b, 2008, 2010 for a diachronic account), en fait de (Lagae, 2007a,b,c; Lagae, 2011b), à propos de (Porhiel, 2001; Péroz, 2003; Prévost, 2008; Lagae, 2011a), côté (Le Querler, 2001; Noailly, 2006), question (Le Querler, 2003, Noailly, 2006) and en ce qui concerne (Debaisieux, 2001; Fløttum, 2003; Anscombre, 2006), this is not the case for the TMs which are at issue here. Pour ce qui est de and au niveau (de) are only mentioned in comparison with other TMs (see Anscombre, 2006 and Porhiel, 2004a,b on pour ce qui est de , and Flament-Boistrancourt, 2002 and Delahaie and Flament-Boistrancourt, 2013 on ( au) niveau (de) ).…”