Contradictions of Populism and Resource Extraction: Examining the Intersection of Resource Nationalism and Accumulation by Dispossession in Mongolia

Abstract

We examine contradictions of populism and resource extraction in Mongolia in the context of the recent presidential election of Khaltmaa Battulga, who is often portrayed as dangerously populist. We consider Battulga's victory as an echo of Mongolian voters' sense of dispossession and discontent driven by gross wealth disparity and precarious livelihoods. Rather than treating these concerns as mere tools of the populist political agenda, we view them as moments of resistance to the asymmetry between accumulation and dispossession in Mongolia, a central outcome of 25 years of the neoliberal regime. We situate our analysis of Mongolia's resource politics through an examination of the world's second largest undeveloped copper-gold mine, Oyu Tolgoi. The mine offers a window into the country's turbulent resource politics that has concentrated wealth among a powerful few while nearly one third of Mongolians remain trapped in vicious poverty. Relying on fieldwork conducted over several years, the paper argues that public grievances against the asymmetry of accumulation and dispossession are routinely discounted by discursive tools within the populist paradigm. "Resource nationalism", in particular, is used by those who promote neoliberalism and the open market as a pejorative label to silence public grievances.

Where are the people? Refocusing political geography on populism

“…However, the government's increasing reliance on natural resources forced it to restructure its populist discourse to portray resource extraction as a natural right of the Bolivian people and to exclude environmental and indigenous groups struggling against it. Similar dynamics are on display in Mongolia, where deep public anger over dispossession and inequality as a result of mining propelled populist presidential candidate Khaltmaa Battulga to victory (Myadar & Jackson, 2018).…”

Contemporary Populism and the Environment

“…At the same time, resource nationalism, for example copper mining in Mongolia, may also be a form of resistance to neoliberal reforms and grievances against the market. Myadar & Jackson (35) argue that rather than "manipulated mindless masses," the case of Mongolia demonstrates resistance to external forms of extraction through the election of a strong supporter of the nationalization of copper. In Ecuador, the Correa regime enacts petro-populist discourses to stake claims of authority and legitimacy based on the state's ability to game volatile oil markets (36).…”

Building Merit: The Moral Economy of the Illegal Wildlife Trade in Rural, Post-Socialist Eastern Mongolia

“…10 Even on the macro or urban level, the narrative of "resource nationalism" has been on the rise in recent history. This is a nativist or protectionist economic discourse that Mongolians have greater claims to the proceeds of the nation's mineral resources than do foreigners (Myadar and Jackson 2019). On the micro, rural level, Sneath and Munkherdene have noted a rise in claims that residents from a rural area also have greater entitlement to the resource reserves on account of their homeland belonging-a discourse called "nutag-ism" (2018: 822-83).…”