2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-37784-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contradiction Studies: Exploring the Field. An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The logic of contradiction entails the already mentioned “axiomatic imperative of ‘freedom from contradiction’” and thus becomes a means of control, one that “derives normativity” (Lossau et al, 2019: 4–7). This “Law of Non-Contradiction” can, according to Febel et al (2023: 1–2), who trace it back as far as Aristotle, be “considered to be the foundation of all philosophy” and remains widely accepted. Yet, they continue, “[c]ontradiction is not only a philosophical concept, but also a form of argumentation, of structuring thoughts and framing ideas” (p. 2).…”
Section: Starting a Dialogue: Memory And Contradiction Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The logic of contradiction entails the already mentioned “axiomatic imperative of ‘freedom from contradiction’” and thus becomes a means of control, one that “derives normativity” (Lossau et al, 2019: 4–7). This “Law of Non-Contradiction” can, according to Febel et al (2023: 1–2), who trace it back as far as Aristotle, be “considered to be the foundation of all philosophy” and remains widely accepted. Yet, they continue, “[c]ontradiction is not only a philosophical concept, but also a form of argumentation, of structuring thoughts and framing ideas” (p. 2).…”
Section: Starting a Dialogue: Memory And Contradiction Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foucault (1972: 149) also considered this logic and calls it “the law of coherence” that orders us not to “multiply” but instead resolve, or at least manage, contradictions. Consequently, “demands to avoid contradictions can be used to create order or to eliminate unwelcome opinions and supposedly ‘irrational’ behaviour” (Febel et al, 2023: 2). Allowing for contradiction is, according to this rationale, viewed as irrational, while maintaining consistency is associated with reason and the ability to think (and act) logically.…”
Section: Starting a Dialogue: Memory And Contradiction Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%