“…Dynamic RFD has typically been assessed using different joint movements such as isolated knee extension (Dewhurst et al., ; Molina & Denadai, ), hip extension (LaRoche et al., ), squat (Sleivert & Taingahue, ), elbow flexion and extension (Mirkov et al., ; Adamson et al., ; Ingebrigtsen et al., ), bench press (Pryor et al., ; Wilson et al., ), weightlifting movements (Haff et al., ; Kilduff et al., ; Comfort, ) and different jump tests either with CMJ and DJ or without SJ stretch‐shortening cycle involvement (SSC) (Haff et al., ; Marcora & Miller, ; Kawamori et al., ; McLellan et al., ; Jakobsen et al., ). Although only few studies have compared RFD values across different contraction modes (Pryor et al., ; Wilson et al., ; Haff et al., , ; Tillin et al., ), it seems that different muscle actions (concentric, eccentric, isometric or SSC) produce large variations in RFD. In general, the results of these studies indicate that absolute RFD values are lower during isometric compared to concentric (Pryor et al., ; Wilson et al., ; Haff et al., , ) or eccentric (Pryor et al., ) test contractions, whereas the differences between absolute concentric and eccentric RFD remain less clear (Pryor et al., ).…”