2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
63
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
63
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods include incremental placement of the restoration, soft start curing technique, the use of stress absorbing cavity liners and modification in the material composition [2,21,22]. Polymerization shrinkage for monomers such as Bis-GMA and TEGDMA had been found to be substantially higher than the typically filled composites [13,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods include incremental placement of the restoration, soft start curing technique, the use of stress absorbing cavity liners and modification in the material composition [2,21,22]. Polymerization shrinkage for monomers such as Bis-GMA and TEGDMA had been found to be substantially higher than the typically filled composites [13,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCD-DI-HEA was also introduced as a low shrinking monomer and it was incorporated in Venus diamond material from Haeraus Kulzer GmbH, Germany. This low viscosity monomer has a rigid back bone that results in low shrinking behavior [22,34,35]. In addition, ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate (Bis-EMA) which is a Bis-GMA analog with lower viscosity due to the absence of hydroxyl groups from its structure was introduced for a similar purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research supports this point in that low volumetric shrinkage does not necessarily correspond to a low polymerization stress development. 2,5 Marchesi and others 22 support this assumption, as they have revealed no significant difference between Filtek P90 and Filtek Z250 in the recorded shrinkage stresses after five minutes. Additionally, the microtensile results recorded by Van Ende and others 27 failed to confirm that silorane resin composite (Filtek P90) induces less stress at the adhesive interface compared with methacrylate resin.…”
Section: E-46mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The cationic ring opening of oxirane moieties in the silorane-based composite yields a reduced volumetric shrinkage 21,22 in contrast to the free radical addition reaction of the double bonds of the dimethacrylate-based composite. 4,7,23 When acidic cations attack the oxirane rings, the cleavage and opening of these rings gain space, thus counteracting the loss of volume occurring in the subsequent step when covalent bonds are formed.…”
Section: E-46mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, stress (S) is determined by multiplying the volumetric shrinkage (VS) by the modulus of elasticity (E) of the material (S=VS×E). The silorane-based composite has been shown to have a modulus of elasticity similar to that of methacrylatebased composites 23) . In the present study, we believe that, irrespective of the similarity in the modulus of elasticity between the two composites, the polymerization shrinkage of the methacrylate monomers led to an increase in polymerization stress, and disrupted some parts of the restoration margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%