2015
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/28/11/4117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraction in the Wasserstein metric for some Markov chains, and applications to the dynamics of expanding maps

Abstract: Abstract. We employ techniques from optimal transport in order to prove decay of transfer operators associated to iterated functions systems and expanding maps, giving rise to a new proof without requiring a Doeblin-Fortet (or Lasota-Yorke) inequality.Our main result is the following. Suppose T is an expanding transformation acting on a compact metric space M and A : M → R a given fixed Hölder function, and denote by L the Ruelle operator associated to A. We show that if L is normalized (i.e. if L (1) = 1), th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that a path in a metric space defined on an interval I is said to be absolutely continuous when it has a metric speed in L 1 (I): this is a very weak regularity, so that Theorem E can be interpreted as meaning that a small perturbation of the potential induces a brutal reallocation of the mass distribution in the sense of W 2 . This contrasts with a Lipschitz regularity result obtained for the 1-Wasserstein metric in [KLS14] (but note that W 1 does not yield a differential structure).…”
Section: From Integral Differentiation To a Riemannian Metriccontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that a path in a metric space defined on an interval I is said to be absolutely continuous when it has a metric speed in L 1 (I): this is a very weak regularity, so that Theorem E can be interpreted as meaning that a small perturbation of the potential induces a brutal reallocation of the mass distribution in the sense of W 2 . This contrasts with a Lipschitz regularity result obtained for the 1-Wasserstein metric in [KLS14] (but note that W 1 does not yield a differential structure).…”
Section: From Integral Differentiation To a Riemannian Metriccontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Example 2.6. When T is expanding in a relatively general sense and X (Ω) is a space of Hölder functions, (H3) and (H4) are proved in [KLS14] (the spectral gap is proved there for normalized potentials only, but see remark 2.9).…”
Section: Transfer Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that d r ≤d ≤ αd r which implies that W r ≤W ≤ αW r andD ≤ D r ≤ αD. The following Theorem is an adaption of Lemma 2.1 in [10] (see also [8]). Theorem 2.2.…”
Section: Exponential Decay and Continuitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The authors would like to point out that the novelty of this section is the method of proof based on the Vaserstein metric and the family {P x m,n }. The arguments for the contraction of the Vaserstein metric were already known in the context of Markov operators (see [6]) and for normalized potentials ( [10,8]). By considering {P x m,n }, these arguments immediately can be adapted to arbitrary Hölder potentials without a priori having knowledge about the properties of {h x }, {ρ x } and {ν x }.…”
Section: Exponential Decay and Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under certain assumptions, we can compute a formula forL. In fact we have the following (see Propositions 28,35,34).…”
Section: A General Linear Response Results For Regularizing Markov Opementioning
confidence: 99%