2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11512-010-0127-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contracting automorphisms and Lp-cohomology in degree one

Abstract: We characterize those Lie groups, and algebraic groups over a local field of characteristic zero, whose first reduced L p -cohomology is zero for all p>1, extending a result of Pansu. As an application, we obtain a description of Gromov-hyperbolic groups among those groups. In particular we prove that any non-elementary Gromov-hyperbolic algebraic group over a non-Archimedean local field of zero characteristic is quasi-isometric to a 3-regular tree. We also extend the study to general semidirect products of a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first prove (i), which is a simple consequence of the structure of the boundary. We next prove (ii), using L p -cohomology computations from [CT11].…”
Section: Qi-invariance Of the -Invariantmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first prove (i), which is a simple consequence of the structure of the boundary. We next prove (ii), using L p -cohomology computations from [CT11].…”
Section: Qi-invariance Of the -Invariantmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We use computations of L p -cohomology carried out in [CT11] (inspired by Pansu's computations for Lie groups). Recall that for any locally compact group G endowed with a left Haar measure, its first L p -cohomology group H p 1 (G) is defined as the 1-cohomology of its right regular representation.…”
Section: Qi-invariance Of the -Invariantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, from the discrete case, the intuition has grown that hyperbolicity and amenability are somehow incompatible: it is known that non-elementary finitely generated hyperbolic groups contain a free non-abelian subgroup F 2 and are thus non-amenable. On the other hand, in [14], the authors prove the counter-intuitive fact that there do exist amenable non-elementary locally compact hyperbolic groups! There are plenty of other differences as well: for example, it is possible for locally compact hyperbolic groups to act transitively on their boundary, even if the boundary is infinite.…”
Section: Locally Compact Hyperbolic Groupsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One should think of ℓ q,p cohomology as a (large scale) topological invariant. It has been useful in several contexts, mainly for the class of hyperbolic groups where the relevant value of q is q = p, see [2,3,5,6] for instance. It is interesting to study a class of spaces where values of q = p play a significant role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,(5) and |∇| µ+k = |∇| µ |∇| k on S for µ, k ∈ N as comes from[8, Theorem 3.15]. Density of S 0 and extension of K c…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%