2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contract grading in the technical writing classroom: Blending community-based assessment and self-assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, college students under the contract earned higher grades compared to their peers in traditional grading courses (Lindemann & Harbke, 2011), reported increased involvement in the assessment process (Litterio, 2016), and perceived a stronger sense of control over their grades (Litterio, 2018). While both Lindemann and Harbke (2011) and Litterio (2018) concluded their recent work by encouraging teachers to implement contract grading to bolster academic performance and student responsibility, contract grading has remained unexamined in secondary classrooms where students face considerable threats to their well-being from achievement pressure.…”
Section: Contract Grading Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, college students under the contract earned higher grades compared to their peers in traditional grading courses (Lindemann & Harbke, 2011), reported increased involvement in the assessment process (Litterio, 2016), and perceived a stronger sense of control over their grades (Litterio, 2018). While both Lindemann and Harbke (2011) and Litterio (2018) concluded their recent work by encouraging teachers to implement contract grading to bolster academic performance and student responsibility, contract grading has remained unexamined in secondary classrooms where students face considerable threats to their well-being from achievement pressure.…”
Section: Contract Grading Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warner observed that this nuance fostered positive affect and self-confidence. In this way, the treatment group participated in the learning and assessment process, while the teacher held the final decision over the grade, a common practice among contract grading practitioners (Danielewicz & Elbow, 2009;Potts, 2010;Litterio, 2018).…”
Section: The Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past decades, alternative approaches to assessment have been practiced by a number of scholars in different disciplines, such as utilizing assessments as a toolkit to promote student learning (Tang & Biggs 1998;Carless 2002); integrating writing assessment with Blending community (Litterio, 2018); using online assessment (Zohre, 2018);conducting electronic assessment (Upton, Ene, 2018), creating assessment in Online Writing Forums (Birch, 2016); emerging within the literature (Behizadeh and Engelhard, 2011), and using web for students assessment (Williams, 2009). This approach should be taken into consideration for lecturers to make innovatein writing assessment indifferent disciplines.…”
Section: Research Traditions In Measurement Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another major phase of classroom collaboration that I did not have the space to fully address in this chapter is the assessment of collaborative work. Scholars such as Inoue (2005Inoue ( & 2012, Litterio (2016Litterio ( & 2018, and Medina and Walker (2018) all have great work on social justice approaches to contract grading and community-based assessment. I am specifically drawn to the idea of community-based assessment practices used in combination with FDC-informed team contracts.…”
Section: Limitations and Implications For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%