2016
DOI: 10.25300/misq/2016/40.1.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contract Design Choices and the Balance of Ex Ante and Ex Post Transaction Costs in Software Development Outsourcing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, prior empirical studies have examined the impact of crossing either a country boundary only (e.g., Cramton & Hinds, ), a firm boundary only (e.g., Espinosa, Cummings, Wilson, & Pearce, ), or both boundaries (e.g., Kotlarsky, Scarbrough, & Oshri, ; Liu & Aron, ) on project outcomes independently. Further, a number of empirical studies focusing on projects that cross firm boundaries often refer to their sourcing structures as “business process outsourcing” or “software development outsourcing” without differentiating the projects that may also cross a country boundary (Benaroch, Lichtenstein, & Fink, ; Chen, Bharadwaj, & Goh, ). Surprisingly, few studies have carried out a systematic comparative assessment of performance differences across the different types of sourcing structures at the project level.…”
Section: Conceptual Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, prior empirical studies have examined the impact of crossing either a country boundary only (e.g., Cramton & Hinds, ), a firm boundary only (e.g., Espinosa, Cummings, Wilson, & Pearce, ), or both boundaries (e.g., Kotlarsky, Scarbrough, & Oshri, ; Liu & Aron, ) on project outcomes independently. Further, a number of empirical studies focusing on projects that cross firm boundaries often refer to their sourcing structures as “business process outsourcing” or “software development outsourcing” without differentiating the projects that may also cross a country boundary (Benaroch, Lichtenstein, & Fink, ; Chen, Bharadwaj, & Goh, ). Surprisingly, few studies have carried out a systematic comparative assessment of performance differences across the different types of sourcing structures at the project level.…”
Section: Conceptual Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, fixedprice and time-and-materials contracts are two typical software outsourcing arrangements. Previous research compares the differences between the two contracts in transaction costs [3,8] and incentive mechanisms [13]. However, almost all the analyses mentioned above viewed software outsourcing contracts as complete.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, almost all the analyses mentioned above viewed software outsourcing contracts as complete. In practice, contracting for software development outsourcing is inevitably incomplete [3] because it typically involves unforeseen contingencies [10], noncontractible investments and behaviors [27], and immeasurable performance [11]. Bhattacharya et al [4] studied incomplete software outsourcing contracts with renegotiation, but they focused on designing a renegotiation-proof contract.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Robillard [1], software development is the "progressive crystallization of knowledge into a language that can be read and executed by a computer" (p.92). Accordingly, a principal challenge that lies at the heart of software development is knowledge asymmetry between those participants who possess business knowledge and developers who possess technical knowledge [2]. Collaboration can mitigate knowledge asymmetry by allowing team members to discuss and reconcile differing views, which can help identify errors early on in the software lifecycle and before they turn into software bugs in production environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%