2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00259-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contraceptive efficacy and clinical performance of Nestorone implants in postpartum women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study on the clinical performance of NES implant in 100 breastfeeding women reported no pregnancy [65], The advantage of Nestorone implants in the postpartum period would be high as the progestin is not active orally, destroyed quickly after oral ingestion and any small amount ingested by the infant through the mother’s milk will be inactivated rapidly. No effect of NES on lactation and infant growth and no serious adverse events were observed in the long-term study comparing the NES implant to the T-Cu IUD [65]. Lactational amenorrhea was significantly longer in NES users (353 ± 20 days) than in T-Cu users (201 ± 11 days).…”
Section: Female Contraceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study on the clinical performance of NES implant in 100 breastfeeding women reported no pregnancy [65], The advantage of Nestorone implants in the postpartum period would be high as the progestin is not active orally, destroyed quickly after oral ingestion and any small amount ingested by the infant through the mother’s milk will be inactivated rapidly. No effect of NES on lactation and infant growth and no serious adverse events were observed in the long-term study comparing the NES implant to the T-Cu IUD [65]. Lactational amenorrhea was significantly longer in NES users (353 ± 20 days) than in T-Cu users (201 ± 11 days).…”
Section: Female Contraceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies reported on infant outcomes of mothers using nonorally available progestogens, none new. Infant growth was no different in users of nesterone pellets compared with nonhormonal methods [63]; neither infant growth nor health was different between users of progesterone pellets and users of nonhormonal methods [54]. Similarly, there was no difference in infant growth or development between infants of users of nesterone implants and Cu-IUD users [64].…”
Section: Multiple Progestogen-only Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Three studies, none new, assessed the impact of nonorally available progestogens (progesterone pellets and nesterone or elcometrine implants) on breastfeeding outcomes. In two of these, breastfeeding duration was similar between women using progesterone pellets [54] or a nesterone implant [63], compared with Cu-IUD. Elcometrine implant users had a higher rate of breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months and similar rates at 9-12 months compared with Cu-IUD users [64].…”
Section: Popsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Use of the NES implant did not show any serious adverse events on lactation and infant growth [84]. These systems have not been fully developed but the NES implant is being tested in China in family planning programs.…”
Section: Intrauterine Contraceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%