2012
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONTRA: copy number analysis for targeted resequencing

Abstract: Motivation: In light of the increasing adoption of targeted resequencing (TR) as a cost-effective strategy to identify disease-causing variants, a robust method for copy number variation (CNV) analysis is needed to maximize the value of this promising technology.Results: We present a method for CNV detection for TR data, including whole-exome capture data. Our method calls copy number gains and losses for each target region based on normalized depth of coverage. Our key strategies include the use of base-level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
245
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
245
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this algorithm is time-processor-consuming and, therefore, other software such as CONTRA should offer an interesting alternative. 30 A major advantage of the NGS procedure is that the progressive implementation of specific software should allow the detection of other types of alterations, which are not found by using conventional procedures. For instance, complex rearrangements, such as inversions, should be detected taking advantage of paired-end data, by using software such as PINDEL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this algorithm is time-processor-consuming and, therefore, other software such as CONTRA should offer an interesting alternative. 30 A major advantage of the NGS procedure is that the progressive implementation of specific software should allow the detection of other types of alterations, which are not found by using conventional procedures. For instance, complex rearrangements, such as inversions, should be detected taking advantage of paired-end data, by using software such as PINDEL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence variation was identified using multiple software tools to capture the full spectrum of DNA variation; singlenucleotide polymorphisms and small (o10 base pairs) insertions and deletions (indels) were determined using samtools 31 (http://samtools.sourceforge.net) to ensure a low false-positive rate; larger indels (410 base pairs) were identified using Pindel 32 (https:// trac.nbic.nl/pindel); translocations were identified using Breakdancer 33 (http://breakdancer.sourceforge. net); and copy number variation was identified using CONTRA 34 (http://contra-cnv.sourceforge.net). Sequence variants were then annotated using the SeattleSeq annotation server (http://gvsbatch.gs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since deletions generate genotypic signatures identical to isodisomy, this step is essential to prevent the unintentional ascription of deletions as UPD. With the availability of tools to detect CNVs from SNP genotyping and exome data (Love et al 2011;Fromer et al 2012;Li et al 2012; P Vijayarangakannan, T Fitzgerald, C Joyce, S McCarthy, ME Hurles, pers. comm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%