2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.571789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour matching for a fish recognition and migration-monitoring system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the system is capable of running other software for fish detection/recognition given that it saves the results according to our database definitions. It would be interesting to compare the fish recognition methodologies [22,31,44] with eachother. Also if new software is created, it would be interesting to see how the performance differs from the existing software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the system is capable of running other software for fish detection/recognition given that it saves the results according to our database definitions. It would be interesting to compare the fish recognition methodologies [22,31,44] with eachother. Also if new software is created, it would be interesting to see how the performance differs from the existing software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work in fish recognition [42,41] is focussed on fish on conveyor belts and classifies fish based on shape and colour. Classification of fish in aquariums and tanks [44,22] is more challenging than classification of dead fish [21]. The first research in unrestricted natural environments [31] is able to classify between two different species, where Spampinato et al (2010) classified 360 images of ten different species (which is one of the largest datasets mentioned in literature).…”
Section: Diver Observations Video Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we can achieve this accuracy with zero-parameter Euclidean distance and get zero error with DTW. The data donors of the fish dataset tested many shape descriptors, such as Fourier descriptors, polygon approximation and line segments to achieve the best error rate of 36.0% [19], however, we get dramatically lower error rates for both Euclidean distance and DTW.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Shape Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors are interested in classifying fish. The fish shapes are reduced down to mere 40 data points because they "… found that a reduced data set of 40 points was sufficient to retain the important shape features for comparison" [19]. This dramatic data reduction did make the similarity measure more tractable, but we wondered if the assumption that it "retain(s) the important shape features" was true.…”
Section: Brute Force Rotation Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation