2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-003-0435-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour integration and segmentation with self-organized lateral connections

Abstract: Contour integration in low-level vision is believed to occur based on lateral interaction between neurons with similar orientation tuning. How such interactions could arise in the brain has been an open question. Our model suggests that the interactions can be learned through input-driven self-organization, i.e. through the same mechanism that underlies many other developmental and functional phenomena in the visual cortex. The model also shows how synchronized firing mediated by these lateral connections can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural models that concentrate on one of these aspects of grouping are bound to have different features or to exhibit different behaviors. Models that start by using correlated firing of neural units as a hypothesis for the emergence of dynamic binding (Choe & Miikkulainen, 2004;Li, 1998;Yen & Finkel, 1998) might have more potential as an explanation of transient global grouping (but note the critical evaluation by Shadlen & Movshon, 1999, and the recent data on curve tracing by Roelfsema, Lamme, & Spekreijse, 2004). In their specifications of neural architecture, the authors of these models often rely on the now well-established finding that long-range connections between pyramidal neurons in area V1 tend to connect groups of cells with a similar orientation tuning (Gilbert, 1992;Gilbert et al, 1996;Stettler et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural models that concentrate on one of these aspects of grouping are bound to have different features or to exhibit different behaviors. Models that start by using correlated firing of neural units as a hypothesis for the emergence of dynamic binding (Choe & Miikkulainen, 2004;Li, 1998;Yen & Finkel, 1998) might have more potential as an explanation of transient global grouping (but note the critical evaluation by Shadlen & Movshon, 1999, and the recent data on curve tracing by Roelfsema, Lamme, & Spekreijse, 2004). In their specifications of neural architecture, the authors of these models often rely on the now well-established finding that long-range connections between pyramidal neurons in area V1 tend to connect groups of cells with a similar orientation tuning (Gilbert, 1992;Gilbert et al, 1996;Stettler et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches are generally taken when trying to model contour integration. The first is the biological route (Yen and Finkel 1998;Li 1998;Grigorescu et al 2003;Mundhenk and Itti 2003;Choe and Miikkulainen 2004;Ben-Shahar and Zucker 2004). In this method, the idea is to create a model of contour integration that explores how the brain may perform such activities.…”
Section: Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, adding to the previous argument, there seems to be some ability for neurons in visual cortex to enhance a contour's perceptibility at locations represented by neurons that they are not directly connected to. Several theories have been advanced to explain how that can happen, for instance neural synchronization (Yen and Finkel 1998;Choe and Miikkulainen 2004), potential propagation (Li 1998) and fast plasticity (Braun 1999;Mundhenk and Itti 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recurrent (artificial) neural network models are able to exhibit rich temporal dynamics [4], [5], [6]. Thus, time becomes an essential factor in neural network operation, whether it is natural or artificial (also see [7], [8], [9], [10]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%