2008
DOI: 10.1177/1536867x0800800206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour-Enhanced Funnel Plots for Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Funnel plots are commonly used to investigate publication and related biases in meta-analysis. Although asymmetry in the appearance of a funnel plot is often interpreted as being caused by publication bias, in reality the asymmetry could be due to other factors that cause systematic differences in the results of large and small studies, for example, confounding factors such as differential study quality. Funnel plots can be enhanced by adding contours of statistical significance to aid in interpreting the funn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta-regression was applied to explore the source of heterogeneity [e.g., mean age, percentage of females, body mass index (BMI), follow-up time and ASA status] if data were available. Publication bias was assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots [18,20] and Egger tests [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-regression was applied to explore the source of heterogeneity [e.g., mean age, percentage of females, body mass index (BMI), follow-up time and ASA status] if data were available. Publication bias was assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots [18,20] and Egger tests [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subgroup or sensitivity analysis was then performed according to the results of meta-regression. Publication bias was assessed using contour funnel plots [21,22] and Egger tests [8]. Asymmetry of the funnel plot might be due to missing data in some studies, in which the results that were negative might not have been published and thus could not be identified.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For primary outcomes we drew funnel plots of trials comparing any active intervention with non-intervention or placebo controls,33 enhanced by contours dividing the plots into areas of significance and non-significance at a two-sided p=0.05,34 35 and added lines of predicted treatment effects derived from univariable random effects meta-regression models using the standard error as explanatory variable 36 37. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed with Egger's test 38…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%