2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25066-8_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour Dice Loss for Structures with Fuzzy and Complex Boundaries in Fetal MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A batch size of 1 was used to increase the generalization and to be able to fit the image on the available GPU memory. The sum of the boundary dice loss, boundary binary-cross entropy, and focal Tversky loss (α=0.7, β=0.3, γ=1.5) were used as the loss functions, and the Adam optimizer (learning rate=0.001) was used for training 41,42 . The input data (bone segmentation and the corresponding metadata) was split into ∼70% training and ∼30% validation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A batch size of 1 was used to increase the generalization and to be able to fit the image on the available GPU memory. The sum of the boundary dice loss, boundary binary-cross entropy, and focal Tversky loss (α=0.7, β=0.3, γ=1.5) were used as the loss functions, and the Adam optimizer (learning rate=0.001) was used for training 41,42 . The input data (bone segmentation and the corresponding metadata) was split into ∼70% training and ∼30% validation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the boundary dice loss, boundary binary-cross entropy, and focal Tversky loss (α = 0.7, β = 0.3, γ = 1.5) were used as the loss functions, and the Adam optimizer (learning rate = 0.001) was used for training. 41,42 The input data (bone segmentation and the corresponding metadata) was split into ∼70% training and ∼30% validation. The models were trained for 40…”
Section: Training Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%