2022
DOI: 10.11607/prd.5840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour Changes Following Implant Placement and Concomitant Soft Tissue Augmentation Applying a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It captures linear and profilometric changes in peri‐implant soft‐tissue dimensions over time following therapeutic intervention to achieve a desired clinical outcome (keratinised mucosa width, mucosal thickness and/or supracrestal tissue height gain) often to facilitate oral hygiene practice, to protect the underlying bone and to reduce the risk of peri‐implant disease onset. Examples of relevant measurements are as follows: Keratinized mucosa width changes using a calibrated periodontal probe (Golmayo et al, 2021) Mucosal thickness changes via transmucosal horizontal probing using a piercing instrument (e.g., endodontic spreader) or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of standard tessellation language (STL) files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Artzi et al, 2022; Chan et al, 2018; Couso‐Queiruga et al, 2021; Hutton et al, 2018). Supracrestal tissue height changes via transmucosal vertical probing using a piercing instrument or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of STL files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Chan et al, 2018; Eghbali et al, 2016; Puisys & Linkevicius, 2015; Thoma et al, 2016; Zeltner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Consensus Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It captures linear and profilometric changes in peri‐implant soft‐tissue dimensions over time following therapeutic intervention to achieve a desired clinical outcome (keratinised mucosa width, mucosal thickness and/or supracrestal tissue height gain) often to facilitate oral hygiene practice, to protect the underlying bone and to reduce the risk of peri‐implant disease onset. Examples of relevant measurements are as follows: Keratinized mucosa width changes using a calibrated periodontal probe (Golmayo et al, 2021) Mucosal thickness changes via transmucosal horizontal probing using a piercing instrument (e.g., endodontic spreader) or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of standard tessellation language (STL) files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Artzi et al, 2022; Chan et al, 2018; Couso‐Queiruga et al, 2021; Hutton et al, 2018). Supracrestal tissue height changes via transmucosal vertical probing using a piercing instrument or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of STL files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Chan et al, 2018; Eghbali et al, 2016; Puisys & Linkevicius, 2015; Thoma et al, 2016; Zeltner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Consensus Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the mandatory outcomes in all BA trials, the consensus identified (i) assessment of surgical complications and adverse events, (e.g., ultrasonography;Artzi et al, 2022;Chan et al, 2018;Couso-Queiruga et al, 2021;Hutton et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It captures linear and profilometric changes in peri‐implant soft‐tissue dimensions over time following therapeutic intervention to achieve a desired clinical outcome (keratinised mucosa width, mucosal thickness and/or supracrestal tissue height gain) often to facilitate oral hygiene practice, to protect the underlying bone and to reduce the risk of peri‐implant disease onset. Examples of relevant measurements are as follows: Keratinized mucosa width changes using a calibrated periodontal probe (Golmayo et al, 2021) Mucosal thickness changes via transmucosal horizontal probing using a piercing instrument (e.g., endodontic spreader) or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of standard tessellation language (STL) files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Artzi et al, 2022; Chan et al, 2018; Couso‐Queiruga et al, 2021; Hutton et al, 2018). Supracrestal tissue height changes via transmucosal vertical probing using a piercing instrument or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of STL files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Chan et al, 2018; Eghbali et al, 2016; Puisys & Linkevicius, 2015; Thoma et al, 2016; Zeltner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Consensus Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreed description of each domain with its measurements follows. B. Mucosal thickness changes via transmucosal horizontal probing using a piercing instrument (e.g., endodontic spreader) or with digital imaging analysis after superimposition of standard tessellation language (STL) files or other advanced imaging methods (e.g., ultrasonography; Artzi et al, 2022;Chan et al, 2018;Couso-Queiruga et al, 2021;Hutton et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VCMX seems to render an alternative favorable solution for autogenous soft tissue augmentation, at least as shown in short-term observational studies (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). At this point, it would be important to evaluate the remodeled tissue at the stromal level to better understand the factors that could contribute to the increased soft tissue thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%