2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00190-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
287
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
287
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Separating theory from data availability and model applicability can ensure debates about theory are not confused with differences in data models. See the papers by Oksanen (1997), Austin and Nicholls (1997), Oksanen and Minchin (2002) for a recent example of a debate over theory and data models concerning the shape of species response curves.…”
Section: A Framework For Statistical Modelling In Plant Community Ecomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Separating theory from data availability and model applicability can ensure debates about theory are not confused with differences in data models. See the papers by Oksanen (1997), Austin and Nicholls (1997), Oksanen and Minchin (2002) for a recent example of a debate over theory and data models concerning the shape of species response curves.…”
Section: A Framework For Statistical Modelling In Plant Community Ecomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a and b values) were set for modelling individual species. Oksanen and Minchin (2002) have now examined a wider range of possible models for the shape of species response curves. A significant issue remains.…”
Section: Ecological Theory Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each species belonging to some of species groups we calculated species response curve to single environmental factors (pH and conductivity) by Huisman, Olff & Fresco (HOF) model of type 5 (Huisman et al 1993) based on logistic regression and following the algorithm of Oksanen & Minchin (2002). The medians of response optima yielded by this method were calculated for each group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplicity increases from model V to model I, because the number of estimated parameters declines (although models III and IV contain the same number of parameters). Oksanen and Minchin (2002) produced an algorithm for model selection that proceeds by fitting the most complex model (V) to the species data using maximum likelihood (with a Poisson error structure), and then by reducing model complexity (to IV, then to III, then to II, and finally to I) until deviance increases significantly (an F-ratio test fails, where P ! 0.05).…”
Section: Climate Variable Selection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their routine, examination of model III occurs only after rejecting model IV over Model V. Therefore, model III may, in fact, represent a superior depiction of the response of some species allocated to model IV. We implemented this procedure for each species detected on at least ten plots and the three selected climate variables with HOF 2.3, an MS-DOS program (Oksanen and Minchin, 2002; available at http://cc.oulu.fi/$jarioksa/) for the quadrat and subplot frequency datasets. For both datasets, nonlinear relationships to climate were statistically significant for most species, and the symmetrical unimodal function was the most common response type (Table 2).…”
Section: Climate Variable Selection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%