2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum reconstruction of the pore scale microstructure for Fontainebleau sandstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst previous pore characterization mostly relied on subjective 2D descriptions of 3D pore structures (Vazquez-Calvo et al, 2007) or by means of computerized reconstructed models (Latief et al, 2010), recently, more and more X-ray CT is being used combined with image analysis to allow complex 3D characterization. Already in the early days of synchrotron Xray micro-CT the technique was used to directly image the 3D pore structure of rocks at micrometers resolution.…”
Section: X-ray Micro-ct Used In Geosciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst previous pore characterization mostly relied on subjective 2D descriptions of 3D pore structures (Vazquez-Calvo et al, 2007) or by means of computerized reconstructed models (Latief et al, 2010), recently, more and more X-ray CT is being used combined with image analysis to allow complex 3D characterization. Already in the early days of synchrotron Xray micro-CT the technique was used to directly image the 3D pore structure of rocks at micrometers resolution.…”
Section: X-ray Micro-ct Used In Geosciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first represents a homogeneous sample and consists of a 15 mm long and 3.75 mm wide reconstructed Fontainebleau sandstone using a stochastic geomet-rical model (Latief et al 2010). We consider the discretisations provided at resolutions of 1.83 µm (512 × 512 × 2, 048 voxel), 3.66 µm (1, 024 × 1, 024 × 4, 096 voxel), and 7.32 µm (2, 048×2, 048×8, 192 voxel).…”
Section: Rock Sample Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the discretisations provided at resolutions of 1.83 µm (512 × 512 × 2, 048 voxel), 3.66 µm (1, 024 × 1, 024 × 4, 096 voxel), and 7.32 µm (2, 048×2, 048×8, 192 voxel). These reconstructions were shown to reproduce the Minkowski functionals of the original imaged rock samples as well as e.g., local percolation properties (Latief et al 2010). We use the different discretisations to discuss discretisation effects for the CM method in the discussion section.…”
Section: Rock Sample Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these techniques is the stochastic-based 2D to 3D reconstruction method, which simulates 3D structure of pore space and mineral phases of rock sample using a 2D image such as a thin section. Liang et al (2000) use an algorithm based on morphological skeletonization, Talukdar and Torsaeter (2002) apply simulated annealing method, Keehm et al (2003) use sequential indicator simulation to reconstruct 3D images, Okabe and Blunt (2004, 2005, 2007) reconstruct a 3D pore space structure using multiple-point statistics and predicted permeability, and Latief et al (2010) represent a model reconstruction based on crystallite properties and diagenetic parameters. In this study, however, we used a newly presented accurate reconstruction method introduced by Sahimi (2012, 2013) using crosscorrelationbased simulation (CCSIM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%