2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.074508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum limit physics from2+1flavor domain wall QCD

Abstract: We present physical results obtained from simulations using 2+1 flavors of domain wall quarks and the Iwasaki gauge action at two values of the lattice spacing a, (a −1 = 1.73 (3) GeV and a −1 = 2.28 (3) GeV). On the coarser lattice, with 24 3 × 64 × 16 points (where the 16 corresponds to L s , the extent of the 5 th dimension inherent in the domain wall fermion (DWF) formulation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
265
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
13
265
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our exploratory studies [7] have been performed using a 24 3 × 64 lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of 1/a = 1.78 GeV, employing Shamir domain wall fermions [12] with Iwasaki gauge action [13], a pion mass of ∼ 430 MeV and a kaon mass of ∼ 625 MeV [14,15]. We use a sample of 128 configurations, each separated by 20 molecular dynamics time units.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our exploratory studies [7] have been performed using a 24 3 × 64 lattice with an inverse lattice spacing of 1/a = 1.78 GeV, employing Shamir domain wall fermions [12] with Iwasaki gauge action [13], a pion mass of ∼ 430 MeV and a kaon mass of ∼ 625 MeV [14,15]. We use a sample of 128 configurations, each separated by 20 molecular dynamics time units.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to cancel divergences with the GIM mechanism we include a charm quark with a bare mass of m = 0.2. Using the mass renormalisation factor Z MS m (2 GeV) = 1.498 for this lattice [14], this corresponds to an unphysical charm quark of mass m MS c (2 GeV) = 533 MeV. The main difficulty of this analysis is the removal of the exponential term that grows with increasing T a ; however in practice we find that it is necessary to also consider a term that falls exponentially with T b , which does not converge in the available time extent (i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the determination of Z A from the RBC/UKQCD combined analysis of the light hadron spectrum, pseudoscalar meson decay constants and quark masses on the 24 3 and 32 3 ensembles [2]. Figure 1 shows the ratios R 1 and R 2 on the 24 3 , m l a = 0.005 ensemble fitted to a constant with statistical errors estimated using single elimination jack-knife.…”
Section: Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis is carried out using ensembles produced by the RBC and UKQCD collaborations [2] with the Iwasaki gauge action and 2+1 flavour dynamical domain-wall fermions. The configurations are at two lattice spacings, the finer 32 2 ensembles have an inverse lattice spacing of a −1 = 2.28(3) GeV and the coarser 24 3 ensmbles have a −1 = 1.73(3) GeV, corresponding to approximately 0.08 fm and 0.11 fm respectively.…”
Section: Calculational Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light quark masses range from 0.005 to 0.03 (pion masses 331 MeV to 672 MeV) with a fixed strange quark mass, am s = 0.04, for the 24 3 ensemble. For the 32 3 ensemble, the light quark mass ranges from 0.004 to 0.006 (pion masses 290 MeV to 420 MeV) with a unitary am s = 0.03 and partially quenched am s = 0.025 [4,5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%