Continuum beliefs of mental illness: a systematic review of measures

Abstract

Purpose The continuum of mental health/illness has been subject to scientific debate for decades. While current research indicates that continuum belief interventions can reduce mental health stigma and improve treatment seeking in affected populations, no study has yet systematically examined measures of continuum beliefs. Methods This preregistered systematic review summarizes measures of continuum beliefs. Following the PRISMA statement, three scientific databases (PubMed, PsycInfo and PsycArticles via EBSCOhost, Web of Science) are searched, instruments are described and discussed regarding their scope, and methodological quality. Results Overall, 7351 records were identified, with 35 studies reporting relevant findings on 11 measures. Most studies examined general population samples and used vignette-based measures. Schizophrenia and depression were most commonly examined, few studies focused on dementia, ADHD, OCD, eating disorders, and problematic alcohol use, or compared continuum beliefs across disorders. Validity was very good for most measures, but reliability was rarely tested. Measures mostly assessed beliefs in the normality of mental health symptoms or the normality of persons with such symptoms but rarely nosological aspects (i.e., categorical v continuous conceptualization of mental disorders). Conclusions Current research provides psychometrically sound instruments to examine continuum beliefs for a variety of mental disorders. While studies suggest utility for general population samples and mental health professionals, more research is necessary to corroborate findings, for instance, regarding age (e.g., in adolescents), gender, or type of mental disorder. Future research should also compare self-report ratings, and vignette-based measures, include measures of nosological concepts to fully grasp the continuum concept of mental illness. Preregistration PROSPERO: CRD42019123606.

Active psychoeducational components of antistigma interventions for untreated depressive symptoms: Specific effects of continuum beliefs?

“…Methodologically, the intervention results regarding the target variables might be limited in terms of comparability due to the lack of validation of the scales and operationalization. For continuum beliefs, for example, the questionnaire was developed specifically for this project due to a lack of existing differentiated and validated questionnaires (Tomczyk et al, 2023). Moreover, we designed a new balanced score operationalizing a biopsychosocial model of causes for mental illness, examining how a participant considers different causal beliefs and how fixed their beliefs are, which has not been reflected by mean values until now (e.g., Carter et al, 2019; Stolzenburg et al, 2018; Tan et al, 2020).…”

Inclusion of the severe and enduring anorexia nervosa phenotype in genetics research: a scoping review

“…Psychiatric illness is often diagnosed in a binary manner; an individual is assessed as either having the illness or not. In reality, due to their complex nature, psychiatric illnesses are better defined on a continuum [ 24 , 25 ]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) often use a binary case-control design.…”

Lived experiences matter: The role of mental health professionals’ psychological crises and vulnerability in shaping their health beliefs and concepts

“…Similarly, the assumption that mental health and illness are either separated by a clear cutoff (categorical conceptualization) or both located within a continuum (continual conceptualization) can have an impact on mental health staff’s attitudes toward service users and their mental health issues ( 4 , 5 ). For example, a categorial view of mental health is associated with more stigmatizing attitudes ( 6 , 7 ), which are known to result in discriminatory behavior ( 8 ).…”