2014
DOI: 10.13189/ujme.2014.020603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum Arm Robotic Manipulator: A Review

Abstract: Traditional robots have rigid underlying structures that limit their ability to interact with their environment. For example, conventional robot manipulators have rigid links and can manipulate objects using only their specialised end effectors. These robots often encounter difficulties operating in unstructured and highly congested environments. A variety of animals and plants exhibit complex movement with soft structures devoid of rigid components. In this paper survey of literature related to continuum arm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To send a soft robot in an unstructured radiation environment for inspection purposes or delivery tasks, it must offer significant dexterity and mechanical compliance, with minimum control requirements. However, disadvantages of soft robots such as limited afforded strength and payload (Lee et al, 2017), limited control and autonomy (Trivedi et al, 2008;Singh and Krishna, 2014), need for tethering (Majidi, 2014;Schmitt et al, 2018), and limited sensory equipment (Rus and Tolley, 2015;Lee et al, 2017) still need to be overcome. To meet some of these demands, the soft actuators within the soft robot must enhance their functionality, which is limited by fabrication techniques (Marchese et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To send a soft robot in an unstructured radiation environment for inspection purposes or delivery tasks, it must offer significant dexterity and mechanical compliance, with minimum control requirements. However, disadvantages of soft robots such as limited afforded strength and payload (Lee et al, 2017), limited control and autonomy (Trivedi et al, 2008;Singh and Krishna, 2014), need for tethering (Majidi, 2014;Schmitt et al, 2018), and limited sensory equipment (Rus and Tolley, 2015;Lee et al, 2017) still need to be overcome. To meet some of these demands, the soft actuators within the soft robot must enhance their functionality, which is limited by fabrication techniques (Marchese et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant recent advancements in the development of CRs [95], [96], [97], control of CRs still poses several challenges due to their limited actuation channels, hyper-flexibility of their structure, and nonlinear models. Modeling and structural uncertainties, lack of exact forward kinematic (FK) solution (such as those used in rigid-link robots), and associated sensing devices lead to end-point positioning uncertainties.…”
Section: Control Of Continuum Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike robots with rigid links, a continuum robot arm can be bent and stretched at any point ( Walker, 2013 ). Additionally, research is being conducted on robots that are mechanically similar to snakes and caterpillars ( Hirose and Yamada, 2009 ; Ishige et al, 2018 , 2019 ; Liu et al, 2020 ), for application in medicine as endoscopes ( Ikuta et al, 1988 ) and in disaster sites ( Kumar Singh and Krishna, 2014 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%