2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-008-0102-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous versus pulsatile administration of rotigotine in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats: contralateral rotations and abnormal involuntary movements

Abstract: Sustained drug delivery providing continuous dopaminergic stimulation is thought to prevent or delay the induction of motor complications (dyskinesia) in Parkinson's disease, whereas pulsatile administration is supposed to promote them. This study investigated the inducibility of sensitization and abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs), comparing continuous and pulsatile administration of rotigotine with pulsatile administration of 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA) for reference. Rats were unilaterally les… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several continuous drug delivery treatments are proposed as useful in reducing the incidence or treatment of dyskinesia [203,205-207], but there is insufficient evidence to characterize them as unequivocally effective [41]. For example, a study on an animal model of PD demonstrated that continuous delivery of rotigotine did not induce dyskinesia and functional sensitization, whereas using an oral formulation at different intervals did [208]. On the other hand, a pilot study on duodenal infusion of L-DOPA was shown to induce similar levels of dyskinesia as pulsatile delivery systems; however, once dyskinesia are present, switching to duodenal L-DOPA reduces the duration of dyskinesia [209].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several continuous drug delivery treatments are proposed as useful in reducing the incidence or treatment of dyskinesia [203,205-207], but there is insufficient evidence to characterize them as unequivocally effective [41]. For example, a study on an animal model of PD demonstrated that continuous delivery of rotigotine did not induce dyskinesia and functional sensitization, whereas using an oral formulation at different intervals did [208]. On the other hand, a pilot study on duodenal infusion of L-DOPA was shown to induce similar levels of dyskinesia as pulsatile delivery systems; however, once dyskinesia are present, switching to duodenal L-DOPA reduces the duration of dyskinesia [209].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in rats unilaterally lesioned with 6 hydroxydopamine investigated the inducibility of contraversive rotations by rotigotine compared to L-DOPA. The increased contraversive turning by both compounds indicated a post-synaptic activity [26]. This finding is further supported by another study showing that both continuous and pulsatile administration of rotigotine improved motor deficits and normalized motor function in MPTP-treated monkeys [27].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics and Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In vivo, sustained rotigotine administration with a slowrelease formulation resulted in decreased extracellular dopamine levels (suggesting continuous receptor stimulation) [10], and reduced the risk of dyskinesia induction (which is observed with pulsatile administration of dopaminergic drugs) [11][12][13].…”
Section: Pharmacodynamic Properties Of Rotigotinementioning
confidence: 99%