1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(96)80010-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous versus cyclic parenteral nutrition during bonemarrow transplantation: assessment and follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, post-HSCT patients are often among the most acutely ill patients in a hospital outside the intensive care unit. The safety and feasibility of this intervention in our population corroborate those of earlier studies ( 3 ), particularly the findings of a study comparing cyclic to continuous TPN in adult HSCT recipients ( 4 ); we submit that they can be applied broadly to adult and pediatric inpatients. Furthermore, the 30%–50% of HSCT recipients who develop hyperglycemia immediately after transplant have increased risks of infection, intensive care hospitalization, and nonrelapse mortality ( 5 ).…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, post-HSCT patients are often among the most acutely ill patients in a hospital outside the intensive care unit. The safety and feasibility of this intervention in our population corroborate those of earlier studies ( 3 ), particularly the findings of a study comparing cyclic to continuous TPN in adult HSCT recipients ( 4 ); we submit that they can be applied broadly to adult and pediatric inpatients. Furthermore, the 30%–50% of HSCT recipients who develop hyperglycemia immediately after transplant have increased risks of infection, intensive care hospitalization, and nonrelapse mortality ( 5 ).…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Over the past decade there have been several publications [1][2][3][4][5] on nutritional support strategies during the clinical treatment phase of blood cell transplant recipients. Less attention has been paid to body weight recovery and eating problems in the post-hospital phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parenteral nutrition support (PNS) was believed to be indispensible in bridging the period of severe gastrointestinal toxicity and pancytopenia. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Despite this, the efficacy of PNS on treatment tolerance or prognosis has never been demonstrated. Recent developments, such as the advent of improved antiemetics and haematopoietic growth Correspondence: JA Iestra, Center for Rehabilitation and Nutritional Sciences, University Hospital Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 23 July 1998; accepted 3 December 1998 factors, have shortened the period of reduced oral food intake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%