2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01156-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous-variable geometric phase and its manipulation for quantum computation in a superconducting circuit

Abstract: Geometric phase, associated with holonomy transformation in quantum state space, is an important quantum-mechanical effect. Besides fundamental interest, this effect has practical applications, among which geometric quantum computation is a paradigm, where quantum logic operations are realized through geometric phase manipulation that has some intrinsic noise-resilient advantages and may enable simplified implementation of multi-qubit gates compared to the dynamical approach. Here we report observation of a co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Finding high quality control pulses and improving complex multi-qubits gates under experimental conditions remains challenging, as evidenced by continued research in this field. 21,36 We believe that nonadiabatic detuning can be a powerful method 21,26,27,36 for two-and three-qubits gates. The errors in the simulated gates are of the same order of magnitude as the errors from incoherent errors; additionally, the gate time is acceptably short (78.5 ns, 1.73/(2g 01,10 )).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 Finding high quality control pulses and improving complex multi-qubits gates under experimental conditions remains challenging, as evidenced by continued research in this field. 21,36 We believe that nonadiabatic detuning can be a powerful method 21,26,27,36 for two-and three-qubits gates. The errors in the simulated gates are of the same order of magnitude as the errors from incoherent errors; additionally, the gate time is acceptably short (78.5 ns, 1.73/(2g 01,10 )).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the quest for quantum error correction and expanding the set of realisable circuits, 1,2 there has been a great effort to improve the design of entangling gates, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and by now there is a rich array of design choices in a variety of quantum computing modalities, including superconducting quantum circuits, 12 trapped ions, 13 quantum dots 14 and NV diamonds. 15,16 Notable designs for entangling gates in superconducting circuits, include fast adiabatic gates, 17 frequency modulation, 11,18 cross resonance 19,20 and resonator-induced phase, 21,22 which effect the gates using longitudinal (first two) or transverse (last two) control of the qubits. Currently, the best results for entangling-gate fidelity using longitudinal control is 99.44%, 3 and using transverse control is 99.1%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization procedure will converge once the constraint (7) has been satisfied and the improvement in ϕ µν (τ g ) between successive iterations drops below a set threshold, chosen to be 10 −4 . A maximally entangling gate may be successfully achieved if ϕ µν (τ g ) ≥ π/8.…”
Section: Maximum-likelihood Procedures For State Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the conditions for attaining the equality in Eq. (18) and saturating the QCRB are |C 1,0 | = 1 [or W P (ω 0 ) = 0] and ω 0 T = 2Kπ. So all the schemes proposed in the examples (i) and (ii) with P (φ I ) measurements satisfy these conditions and thus saturate the QCRB.…”
Section: Precision and Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, open system effects, e.g., decoherence caused by inevitable noises, may reduce the fidelity of the Sagnac phase gate and therefore the expected sensing precision cannot be reached. On the other hand, geometric quantum gates have been studied theoretically [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and demonstrated in experiments [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] for quantum computation. Compared to the dynamic phase, the geometric phase only depends on global geometric features (e.g., area, volume, genus, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%